Matches for "!s", 11744 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sat Jan 09 05:17:51 UTC 2016 <BingoBoingo> massiro: creates either s, sometimes high, others low
Sat Jan 09 05:17:14 UTC 2016 <massiro> low-S is in the signature <R,S>
Sat Jan 09 05:16:05 UTC 2016 <assbot> 15 results for 'low-s' : http://s.b-a.link/?q=low-s
Sat Jan 09 05:16:04 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> !s low-s
Sat Jan 09 05:13:48 UTC 2016 <massiro> i'm suspecting <mircea_popescu> is using an old client and the old client makes txes with high-S values.
Sat Jan 09 05:10:42 UTC 2016 <massiro> latest nodes never accept high-S value transactions and never relays it.
Sat Jan 09 05:09:51 UTC 2016 <massiro> this reminds me of sending tx with a high-S value.
Sat Jan 09 02:57:36 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> and that it is the low-S fucktardation
Sat Jan 09 02:16:46 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> is this the 'low-S' crapolade, still ?!
Sat Jan 09 00:45:15 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> !s milk market
Sat Jan 09 00:03:26 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 08-01-2016 17:09:56; linton_s_dawson: oleganza discusses a way to attack non-upgrading nodes: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3zu8bh/til_in_2016_you_cannot_prevent_soft_forks_in/cyqhbc8
Fri Jan 08 23:19:46 UTC 2016 <pete_dushenski> s/he/they'd
Fri Jan 08 22:59:22 UTC 2016 <BingoBoingo> ?Grades are increasingly a lousy signal, especially at those elite places that just hand out the A?s. So you don?t even have that anymore,?
Fri Jan 08 20:36:29 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> !s okcupidslut
Fri Jan 08 19:26:06 UTC 2016 <thestringpuller> yea. like 40 year olds who went to lollapalooza and stuff in the 90's
Fri Jan 08 17:31:01 UTC 2016 <*> adlai failed his arbitrage on this basis - usg-sponsor doesn't want to engage museum(s) in negotiation, but maybe $alertLurker does
Fri Jan 08 17:22:01 UTC 2016 <BingoBoingo> * adlai notes that bitcoin.org's latest "Appendix A" is basically a restatement of his latest qntra's "footnote #3" << Make a blog point this out. If ben_vulpes can blog so can you.
Fri Jan 08 17:10:32 UTC 2016 <*> adlai notes that bitcoin.org's latest "Appendix A" is basically a restatement of his latest qntra's "footnote #3"
Fri Jan 08 17:10:12 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> linton_s_dawson funny that all the poorfags are so preoccupied with THIS nowadays, huh.
Fri Jan 08 17:09:56 UTC 2016 <linton_s_dawson> oleganza discusses a way to attack non-upgrading nodes: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3zu8bh/til_in_2016_you_cannot_prevent_soft_forks_in/cyqhbc8