Matches for "!s", 11744 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Feb 01 16:36:26 UTC 2016 <ascii_butugychag> !s non-outsourceable
Mon Feb 01 16:20:08 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> trinque maybe it's high s :D
Mon Feb 01 15:34:18 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> + printf(SERR SBLK "can't create database file %s\n", strFileRes.c_str());
Mon Feb 01 13:58:55 UTC 2016 <jurov> straight from horse's mouth: "With the end of Moore’s Law, the cadence at which servers are refreshed with new and improved hardware in the datacenter is likely to slow significantly."
Mon Feb 01 05:36:47 UTC 2016 <mod6> 22900 pts/1 S+ 0:00 grep --colour=auto bitcoind "version" : 99998,
Mon Feb 01 05:18:19 UTC 2016 <BingoBoingo> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=01-02-2016#1392316 << People kept confusing low/high-s malleabillity with the DER encoding business
Mon Feb 01 04:21:37 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 28-01-2016 13:21:58; mircea_popescu: it's a combination of multisecular trends. one is a hate of plastics, that has been brewing for at least five decades. the other is a hate of self, that;s been brewing since ww2, and that expresses itself variously, but for instance in current "carbon"-ecology.
Mon Feb 01 03:35:54 UTC 2016 <phf> ben_vulpes: http://r-s-g.org/kriegspiel/about.php
Mon Feb 01 00:34:50 UTC 2016 <deedbot-> [Qntra] Qntra (S.QNTR) January 2016 Report - http://qntra.net/2016/02/qntra-s-qntr-january-2016-report/
Sun Jan 31 22:39:16 UTC 2016 <mod6> mircea_popescu: that part is just in reference to V's release in R.05, not the high/low S patch which is R.09
Sun Jan 31 22:37:18 UTC 2016 <mod6> mod6's vpatch, `mod6_der_high_low_s.vpatch' [R.09]
Sun Jan 31 22:31:26 UTC 2016 <BingoBoingo> <mircea_popescu> BingoBoingo is actually right, there's some history of derpage in all this. << username high-s malleator used on social media was 'amaclin'
Sun Jan 31 22:30:20 UTC 2016 <BingoBoingo> <mircea_popescu> since they agreed to only include low-s for whatever random reason / concern trolling / misinformed desire to be nice and good, they're stuck now. << It's power derps malleating tx on the way to miners, including on that realy network.
Sun Jan 31 22:28:15 UTC 2016 <BingoBoingo> <ben_vulpes> in that it's possible to malleate in either direction. ease i suppose doesn't figure into the question. << Someone malleating to high-s is why power derps started malleating to low-s
Sun Jan 31 22:22:48 UTC 2016 <ben_vulpes> but there's no actual reason why they couldn't mine high-s transactions, adherence to party line aside.
Sun Jan 31 22:21:26 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> since they agreed to only include low-s for whatever random reason / concern trolling / misinformed desire to be nice and good, they're stuck now.
Sun Jan 31 22:16:27 UTC 2016 <ben_vulpes> now were b,tmsr~ to run its own pool mining only high-s transactions, would clients in the wild reject those blocks?
Sun Jan 31 22:15:43 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> the miners are mining low-s as is and malleating all high-s and mining them as low-s
Sun Jan 31 22:13:41 UTC 2016 <ben_vulpes> i create a transaction with a low s value. someone listening to broadcast transactions can rewrite my tx to have a high s value.
Sun Jan 31 22:06:16 UTC 2016 <ben_vulpes> can someone confirm that it's just as possible to malleate a transaction low->high s as it is to malleate it high->low ?