home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for "the sec", 397 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Wed Jun 04 21:43:03 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   nao if only the sec would be making more definite steps towards halping

Wed Jun 04 21:27:07 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   nubbins`: mp tells the sec to get stuffed, they shrug and then do exactly that << what did you expect'd happen ? a bureaucrat is perhaps the finest detector of who has the bigger stick in existence.

Wed Jun 04 20:09:22 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   BingoBoingo: I still can't believe the SEC implicitly offered MPEx such a glowing endorsement today. << whay not.

Wed Jun 04 18:19:54 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   "The SEC?s investigation was conducted by Daphna A. Waxman, Daphne P. Downes, and Philip R. Moustakis of the New York Regional Office. Ms Waxman's contribution was particularly unimpressive; she has left the SEC to pursue other ventures." << wtf that's a quote ?!

Wed Jun 04 17:31:00 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   nubbins`: "the sec is pleased to announce that it suffered a net loss of only $150,000 in securing mr voorhees' conviction" << it wasn't a conviction. more like "the sec spent 150k for bitcoin people to go "here's a dime go buy something nice for yourself and stfu""

Wed Jun 04 09:20:39 UTC 2014  <davout>   the sec will have to go feck itself eventually

Wed Jun 04 00:31:01 UTC 2014  <nubbins`>   mp tells the sec to get stuffed, they shrug and then do exactly that

Wed Jun 04 00:30:30 UTC 2014  <bloctoc>   Financial Times has a paragraph today on mpex, alongside the SEC story on Erik Vorhees.

Wed Jun 04 00:26:11 UTC 2014  <BingoBoingo>   nubbins`: You're welcome. I mean the summaries suck when the ignore the SEC's endorsement of MPEx in the actual filing.

Tue Jun 03 19:49:36 UTC 2014  <BingoBoingo>   I still can't believe the SEC implicitly offered MPEx such a glowing endorsement today.

Tue Jun 03 18:06:51 UTC 2014  <Naphex>   soo the sec investigators were named

Tue Jun 03 17:15:37 UTC 2014  <chetty>   http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/277ohp/quick_statement_on_the_sec_erik_voorhees/

Tue Jun 03 17:15:37 UTC 2014  <assbot>   Quick statement on the SEC - Erik Voorhees : Bitcoin

Tue Jun 03 16:26:54 UTC 2014  <nubbins`>   "The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Daphna A. Waxman, Daphne P. Downes, and Philip R. Moustakis of the New York Regional Office. Ms Waxman's contribution was particularly unimpressive; she has left the SEC to pursue other ventures."

Tue Jun 03 16:24:14 UTC 2014  <fluffypony>   the SEC couldn't get an official response because they're not in the WoT

Tue Jun 03 16:16:39 UTC 2014  <chetty>   darn pdfs, anyway thats the SEC filing on Eric

Tue Jun 03 16:10:37 UTC 2014  <nubbins`>   "the sec is pleased to announce that it suffered a net loss of only $150,000 in securing mr voorhees' conviction"

Mon May 19 22:32:12 UTC 2014  <assbot>   /Mircea_Popescu I have just read your email exchanges with the SEC, completely impressive, your a freedom fighter champion, congrats!

Thu May 08 11:22:05 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   bounce but srsly, what don't you like about the sec release ?

Thu May 08 11:13:00 UTC 2014  <bounce>   the sec one wanting whateveritwas from mpex

« Previous Page    Next Page »