Matches for "the sec", 397 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Thu Oct 30 14:46:38 UTC 2014 <adlai> why not sell it to the SEC for when they want to regulate bitcoin markets
Thu Oct 30 12:14:22 UTC 2014 <adlai> exchanges are enabling that and the SEC is two decades late to the party
Thu Oct 30 12:11:17 UTC 2014 <thickasthieves> So if the SEC is enabling some traders to get early info, will the SEC fine the SEC?
Thu Oct 30 11:47:58 UTC 2014 <adlai> looks like without this, the SEC wasn't taking into account unexecuted offers, which is kinda laughable if they're trying to detect/prevent "manipulation"
Wed Oct 29 12:32:02 UTC 2014 <thickasthieves> fwiw, i'm sensing a major disturbance in the force, re SEC letters, coinfire DMCA takedowm, COindesk waiving their hands saying 'these are not the sec letters yer lookin for'
Sat Oct 25 21:26:07 UTC 2014 <TheNewDeal> did burnside ever get in trouble with the sec?
Fri Oct 24 00:14:24 UTC 2014 <pete_dushenski> mircea_popescu:meyer lanski famously told some older street thoughs, as a 12 yo, "you get nuttin' for nuttin'". that's all it is. at 12 he's as rich as me telling the sec how to behave. << beauty.
Thu Oct 23 21:06:29 UTC 2014 <IHB_> thanks for the mircea. last time i was in here was when i living in bangalore. you just published your response to the SEC and it was great.
Thu Oct 23 19:38:31 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> meyer lanski famously told some older street thoughs, as a 12 yo, "you get nuttin' for nuttin'". that's all it is. at 12 he's as rich as me telling the sec how to behave.
Fri Oct 17 23:21:25 UTC 2014 <assbot> Logged on 17-10-2014 17:29:41; mircea_popescu: cool, so perhaps qntra should run a piece about how whoever nobody from coinfire divulged today that coinfire is in the posession of signed letters by the sec demanding they do not publish information.
Fri Oct 17 17:30:01 UTC 2014 <*> Adlai was actually pleased about the SEC investigating pirate's scam
Fri Oct 17 17:29:41 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> cool, so perhaps qntra should run a piece about how whoever nobody from coinfire divulged today that coinfire is in the posession of signed letters by the sec demanding they do not publish information.
Fri Oct 17 17:29:33 UTC 2014 <Adlai> are the SEC targeting Moolah for being scammy shysters, or just for running an unregistered business?
Fri Oct 17 17:25:16 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> the sec can try all sorts of things, but why would it talk to some derpy nobody snipping at the edges is unclear.
Fri Oct 17 17:24:44 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> can the SEC even tell someone not to share info?
Fri Oct 17 17:22:14 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> "Coin Fire was first made aware of this investigation on October 14th but officials with the SEC and the Department of Justice actively informed our editorial team to not jeopardize current investigations. However, as new information has come to light and a third source stepped forward with further information our editors now feel compelled to begin publishing information."
Fri Oct 17 17:22:02 UTC 2014 <Adlai> my uncle used to work at the SEC
Thu Oct 16 22:47:51 UTC 2014 <bounce> like the SEC?
Thu Oct 16 17:39:57 UTC 2014 <thestringpuller> what if the SEC lawyer did get GPG? would you actually talk to them?
Thu Oct 16 17:37:12 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> sorta like i'm going "oh, you're just the sec lawyer ? get a gpg we'll talk"