Matches for a, 205125 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Thu Oct 13 15:08:37 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> with a gsm module https://i.imgur.com/axfDELi.jpg
Thu Oct 13 15:08:30 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> its a coffee machine https://www.nespresso.com/pro/us/en/product/zenius
Tue Oct 11 15:34:10 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> quickly add a sexist remark
Tue Oct 11 13:54:06 UTC 2016 <pankkake> took me a while to get it
Tue Oct 11 13:53:55 UTC 2016 <pankkake> that's pretty well done, I was wondering why a tag would have the full readme
Tue Oct 11 13:50:14 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> its a fake, hope you noticed ?
Mon Oct 10 13:58:12 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> how does this cost only 50 a month ?
Sun Oct 09 15:54:13 UTC 2016 <punkman> handy reference for a few things
Sun Oct 09 11:43:55 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> aha ill set up a test node when i have some time see what happens
Sun Oct 09 11:43:14 UTC 2016 <assbot> Join Me on a Market for Anonymity ... ( http://bit.ly/2d0shpA )
Sun Oct 09 11:41:45 UTC 2016 <adlai> so splitting your wallet into multiple ones to increase the count of transactions you perform, is also not guaranteed to increase your bottom-line profit - maybe you get more profit by running a single large offer, with high fees, at a level where there is less supply
Sun Oct 09 11:40:55 UTC 2016 <adlai> if you want to make a 10btc coinjoin, your counterparties need to have a maximum size of at least 10btc each
Sun Oct 09 11:40:02 UTC 2016 <adlai> honestly i'm a little surprised you're more interested in using this for unlinking than as investment, i thought y'all believed that "taint isn't actually a thing", but i guess that's just mircea
Sun Oct 09 11:38:21 UTC 2016 <adlai> this word is a little too overused
Sun Oct 09 11:35:37 UTC 2016 <adlai> if your duplicates get chosen twice, the transaction fails - so it's not a guaranteed way of increasing profits
Sun Oct 09 11:34:13 UTC 2016 <adlai> once you actually get back coins from each counterparty, if they're from the same wallet, the join will fail (it's a double-spend within the same transaction) and different counterparties will be chosen; but the orderbook viewing script is dumb and doesn't go that far in the protocol
Sun Oct 09 11:32:34 UTC 2016 <adlai> so a wallet could have 100BTC, with 20BTC in each mixdepth, and the maximum offer size would only be 20BTC
Sun Oct 09 11:32:08 UTC 2016 <adlai> the wallet has a concept of "mixdepths", which are groups of UTXOs that never get used together in the same transaction
Sun Oct 09 11:31:42 UTC 2016 <adlai> the sum of offer maxsizes is not a good indication of liquidity