home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for danielpbarron, 10234 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Wed Mar 23 22:20:51 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   jurov, get fine with them already. You are wrong.

Wed Mar 23 22:19:53 UTC 2016  <jurov>   trinque, danielpbarron: i am not fine with things, what do you think i can do?

Wed Mar 23 22:15:42 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   does nobody any good*

Wed Mar 23 22:15:29 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   those of you allowing nubbins` to rile you up are in the wrong, and it does nobody but "the enemy" to persist in pretending like there's still something to argue about

Wed Mar 23 22:07:55 UTC 2016  <nubbins`>   if we took all the bees out of danielpbarron's and trinque's panties, we could make honey.

Wed Mar 23 22:07:23 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   we don't know this yet!

Wed Mar 23 22:07:15 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   danielpbarron: dun work this way. he's on the l1.

Wed Mar 23 22:07:03 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   6 more clicks

Wed Mar 23 22:06:57 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   !gettrust assbot nubbins`

Wed Mar 23 22:06:31 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   yay!

Wed Mar 23 21:59:25 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   i really wish you wouldn't

Wed Mar 23 21:51:41 UTC 2016  <trinque>   the way one forgets and falls back into the patterns of his youth.. it almost makes one believe in danielpbarron's demons :p

Wed Mar 23 21:02:51 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   the pages for those other bets do not display the correct amounts... no?

Wed Mar 23 21:02:47 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   danielpbarron: or, rephrase the question, between whom and whom did the debt exist ?

Wed Mar 23 21:02:27 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   what, precisely, was promised, that contradicts this, danielpbarron ?

Wed Mar 23 21:02:23 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   sure it doesn't fit in with your retro-actively claiming the double payment was actually a partial early payment of other bets..

Wed Mar 23 21:01:51 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   look at the bet page for a resolved bet. You'll see that BitBet claims how much it has sent and to which address it has been sent. This is sufficient for agreement.

Wed Mar 23 20:59:48 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   danielpbarron: and if you do not think it needs formalizing, 'we could only all agree if we all saw the light' (WHICH LIGHT?!@!!) - you are gravely mistaken.

Wed Mar 23 20:58:16 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   danielpbarron: as i understand, it was proposed as to one possible solution to formalizing the promise made by bbet when a bet is made.

Wed Mar 23 20:55:38 UTC 2016  <danielpbarron>   the thing proposed isn't worthwile

« Previous Page    Next Page »