Matches for danielpbarron, 10234 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Mar 23 20:14:46 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> no reason it shouldn't be. the above proposition fixes a non-problem
Wed Mar 23 20:14:00 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2016#1439254 << not improvement. breaks bbet as a mixer.
Wed Mar 23 13:50:15 UTC 2016 <PeterL> solrodar if you sign a statement "I give my dog to danielpbarron", then yes it is his dog, and if you later say oops, I meant to give it to bob, then it is up to DPB to give the dog up, but he does not have to
Wed Mar 23 13:46:07 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i guess you don't own your fiats either; the fed does or something
Wed Mar 23 13:44:10 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> where have I done that?
Wed Mar 23 13:43:43 UTC 2016 <solrodar> danielpbarron: But you evidently apply the same principle to fiat bank accounts as well. Anything else? Your dog has just jumped in my window, is it my dog now?
Wed Mar 23 13:40:59 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> you know a private key, someone else might know that private key. neither owns it
Wed Mar 23 13:40:44 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> there is no ownership in bitcoin, except that satoshi owns all of it
Wed Mar 23 13:36:05 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> I was not the recipient of the double funds, but if I had been I would surely keep it
Wed Mar 23 13:35:04 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> you who doesn't believe the Bible are going to say what someone who beileves in the Bible should do?
Wed Mar 23 13:34:36 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> if it's charitable to return then it isn't immoral to keep
Wed Mar 23 13:33:51 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> have you stolen anything?
Wed Mar 23 13:32:07 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> you still haven't explained what's moral about returning the money
Wed Mar 23 13:31:17 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> please do (look hard)
Wed Mar 23 13:29:21 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> 26 Then the woman whose son was living spoke to the king, for she yearned with compassion for her son; and she said, "O my lord, give her the living child, and by no means kill him!" But the other said, "Let him be neither mine nor yours, but divide him." 27 So the king answered and said, "Give the first woman the living child, and by no means kill him; she is his mother." 28 And all Israel heard of the judgment which the ki
Wed Mar 23 13:28:00 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> Thus they spoke before the king. 23 And the king said, "The one says, 'This is my son, who lives, and your son is the dead one'; and the other says, 'No! But your son is the dead one, and my son is the living one.'" 24 Then the king said, "Bring me a sword." So they brought a sword before the king. 25 And the king said, "Divide the living child in two, and give half to one, and half to the other."
Wed Mar 23 13:27:43 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> And the first woman said, "No! But the dead one is your son, and the living one is my son."
Wed Mar 23 13:27:16 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> 22 Then the other woman said, "No! But the living one is my son, and the dead one is your son."
Wed Mar 23 13:27:07 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> 1 Kings 3:16 Now two women who were harlots came to the king, and stood before him. 17 And one woman said, "O my lord, this woman and I dwell in the same house; and I gave birth while she was in the house. 18 Then it happened, the third day after I had given birth, that this woman also gave birth. And we were together; no one was with us in the house, except the two of us in the house. 19 And this woman's son died in the nig
Wed Mar 23 13:26:58 UTC 2016 <shinohai> danielpbarron got to admit things were simpler in times when decisions involved swords.