Matches for danielpbarron, 10234 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sun May 10 21:51:13 UTC 2015 <trinque> danielpbarron: heh! that's a much better reason
Sun May 10 21:51:06 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> i'm going for the poker mostly
Sun May 10 21:50:33 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> the project is pretty dumb and so are most of the people involved in it
Sun May 10 21:48:50 UTC 2015 <trinque> danielpbarron: cool. the free state project's somewhat interesting; I'm doubtful though that the whole 20k will move when that number's "reached"
Sun May 10 21:44:54 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=10-05-2015#1127269 << nah, I just went for the festival last year and I'm going again this year
Sun May 10 21:44:54 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 10-05-2015 18:58:41; trinque: danielpbarron: are you in NH?
Sun May 10 18:58:41 UTC 2015 <trinque> danielpbarron: are you in NH?
Sun May 10 18:54:56 UTC 2015 <hanbot> danielpbarron: wtf is a "porcupine freedom festival"?!
Sun May 10 18:54:52 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> woot danielpbarron should be on your blog!
Sun May 10 18:53:36 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> danielpbarron: AWESOME
Sun May 10 18:53:11 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> re: vermin supreme, I met the guy -> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bre5M-MIMAEVoHf.jpg
Sun May 10 18:29:46 UTC 2015 <davout> danielpbarron: right
Sun May 10 18:28:09 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> davout, Arch. i couldn't get it to run on debian
Sun May 10 18:26:50 UTC 2015 <davout> and i was confused because i didn't remember that danielpbarron's pogo runs a debian thing, hence able to run bitcoind
Sat May 09 17:39:44 UTC 2015 <pete_dushenski> danielpbarron: haha thanks :D
Sat May 09 17:39:28 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> great piece pete_dushenski. I loled a few times
Sat May 09 17:34:11 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> danielpbarron it's possible. not good practice in the sense that now more people can see it.
Sat May 09 17:33:34 UTC 2015 <pete_dushenski> danielpbarron: i believe this is only in newer versions of gpg ?
Sat May 09 17:32:46 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> it's possible to encrypt a message to multiple keys at once, or is this not a good practice?