Matches for danielpbarron, 10234 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue May 05 02:25:55 UTC 2015 <livegnik> danielpbarron: Could you elaborate on the L1 L2 thing for me?
Tue May 05 02:25:02 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> livegnik, do you get the whole L1 L2 thing?
Tue May 05 02:23:18 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> the general score can be ignored for the most part (in the OTC / assbot WoT)
Tue May 05 02:22:45 UTC 2015 <livegnik> danielpbarron: The main difference between Bitcoin-OTC and Identifi, if I understand correctly, is that the Bitcoin-OTC WoT acts as a WoT-for-all, whereas with Identifi each identity has it's own WoT, and there's no 'general' score.
Tue May 05 02:22:20 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> "Martti Malmi is a former computer science student from Helsinki University of Technology who nowadays works as a software developer. He is well-known for being the first person to join Satoshi Nakamoto in the development of Bitcoin."
Tue May 05 02:20:45 UTC 2015 <livegnik> danielpbarron: I like Bitcoin-OTC, even though I haven't used it myself. I do believe that I grasp the concept itself though.
Tue May 05 01:53:31 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> livegnik, what do you make of this? -> http://www.btcalpha.com/wot/trust/?from=asciilifeform&to=danielpbarron
Tue May 05 01:52:10 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> !gettrust livegnik
Tue May 05 01:45:35 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> livegnik, not sure how much you've already found; here's a good starting point http://wiki.bitcoin-assets.com/wot_and_reputation
Tue May 05 01:43:38 UTC 2015 <livegnik> I've just bumped into it, thanks to danielpbarron pointing me to it, and that's how I've ended up in here :)
Tue May 05 01:33:01 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> "CEO & Co-Founder of Identifi -- Collaborating on an Open Source Protocol for Sending Trust over the Internet; Advancing the Wild Wild Web into a Web of Trust."
Tue May 05 01:31:41 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> !up livegnik
Tue May 05 01:25:57 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> <danielpbarron> there's yer answer: it's sha1 << why do we have sha1 anywhere
Tue May 05 01:19:24 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/34uu02/why_increasing_the_max_block_size_is_urgent_gavin/cqycy4h "Rather, the only push you see against larger blocks come from strong advocates of personal autonomy and decenteralization, like Peter Todd; or the MPOE crowd (regardless of what you might think about them, they wouldn't be any to bend to commercial or government interests)."
Tue May 05 00:48:13 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> checks out on my end
Tue May 05 00:48:08 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> there's yer answer: it's sha1; not sha256
Tue May 05 00:47:07 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> http://therealbitcoin.org/mailman/listinfo/btc-dev The system will rename the patch and add unique identifier (SHA-1 hash of the contents) to the filename, both in the outgoing email and in the archives. Any additional signatures must refer to this received filename including the hash.
Tue May 05 00:41:08 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> to make it a pain in the ass to verify any of this stuff; to set the bar high so as to keep out the children
Tue May 05 00:40:30 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> i do not know
Tue May 05 00:39:31 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> the patch.sig is by ascii's key, so it shouldn't matter what it hashes to or what btc-dev says