Matches for danielpbarron, 10234 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Mar 08 18:00:00 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron again, not interested in your hypotheticals
Tue Mar 08 17:59:36 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i thought this was a principled stand. Now it's just that 17 was too much to pay?
Tue Mar 08 17:59:22 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron you're inventing hypothetical situations and saying "apparently this'd be fraud"
Tue Mar 08 17:59:09 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> yeah that's a non-starter
Tue Mar 08 17:58:46 UTC 2016 <jurov> danielpbarron: miner would ask much less than 17btc, dontcha think?
Tue Mar 08 17:58:41 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> apparently any cost >0 would be fraud..
Tue Mar 08 17:58:16 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> at what cost?
Tue Mar 08 17:58:07 UTC 2016 <PeterL> danielpbarron we would be asking him to talk to a miner and have the txn included in a block
Tue Mar 08 17:57:45 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron why are you curious about something that didn't happen?
Tue Mar 08 17:57:24 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i'm curious what would be the argument today if there had never been a transaction B, and transactions A1-An were still nowhere to be found..
Tue Mar 08 17:55:07 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> trinque, and since the alternative was apparently liquidating bbet shares at 0.00001 btc per share, it's absurd that anyone arguing in favor of this outcome has the shareholders interests at heart
Tue Mar 08 17:53:47 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i don't agree with the stupid mistake hypothesis either
Tue Mar 08 17:50:46 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> PeterL, i've never run a business, i don't know if those things are needed or what
Tue Mar 08 17:50:15 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> when that bbet february statement came out, i read it and breathed a sigh of relief, not knowing how controversial it apparently was
Tue Mar 08 17:49:52 UTC 2016 <PeterL> danielpbarron if mircea_popescu had sent the funds to his wallet and spent them on hookers and blow, would that count as fraud or would you let him asses that as "the cost of doing business"?
Tue Mar 08 17:49:31 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i said i was ok with what he ended up doing, ~before~ he did it
Tue Mar 08 17:48:06 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron that disagreement is essentially the only one on the table
Tue Mar 08 17:47:52 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i don't agree there was any fraud
Tue Mar 08 17:47:32 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> well isn't that the expectation? the whole point of the broker is to hold the funds, and place the orders on my behalf..
Tue Mar 08 17:47:13 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron you're steadfastly dodging the point that MP's fraudulent math is the issue. IDGAF if it's bbet or him and vexual playing dice