Matches for danielpbarron, 10234 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 07 14:37:13 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i suppose that there are plenty of groups, including miners, who would like to interfere with #bitcoin-assets properties
Mon Mar 07 14:36:03 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> yes
Mon Mar 07 14:35:34 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> "how many nubbins`" in an endearing way
Mon Mar 07 14:35:23 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> that wasn't my implication. I meant "
Mon Mar 07 14:34:39 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i'm just going by what you said
Mon Mar 07 14:33:49 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron don't pretend to assume you know how many glass cannons i have
Mon Mar 07 14:17:34 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> nubbins`> again, i could create 10k tx's right now with older inputs than A1 << isn't this a "glass canon" as in, can only be fired once? How many nubbins` are out there with cannons? It costs money to assemble this weapon in short order. You have it from years of doing business.
Mon Mar 07 14:15:52 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> asciilifeform> i have nfi, btw, what the age was. did you look into it? << http://qntra.net/2016/03/a-miner-problem/#comment-47581
Mon Mar 07 13:35:31 UTC 2016 <nubbins`> danielpbarron if your interest in a subject is predicated on who else is interested in it, then i have no sensible response
Mon Mar 07 13:33:54 UTC 2016 <shinohai> Not a lord here, but I have a lot of time invested in trb and I agree with danielpbarron.
Mon Mar 07 13:33:46 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> it's not like the code is something wonderful to behold. The only thing it had going for it was that some important people found a use in it for a time
Mon Mar 07 13:32:31 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i'm not interested in bitcoin if he's not interested in it
Mon Mar 07 13:21:48 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> nubbins`, it looks like you're the one throwing a tantrum, and it "shouldn't work that way" is the general complaint in here against bitcoin for some time now. this event was more like the last straw kinda thing
Mon Mar 07 02:44:21 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> not people who want euros, so much as they ~don't want~ bitcoin, and don't want to touch actual fiat
Mon Mar 07 02:43:52 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> well it's pretty obvious to me what caused the insane prices. "divestment"
Mon Mar 07 02:43:27 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> ah actual euros
Mon Mar 07 02:42:57 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> jurov, how to do that? ask you here?
Mon Mar 07 02:40:12 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i don't see how a "mempool flood" should effect a high priority transaction.. or was the flooder sophisticated enough to have created all the inputs long ago so that they too would be high priority?
Mon Mar 07 02:29:50 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i guess this falls into the "well what the heck is the protocol, oh right there isn't one" category. How do you know a miner will choose a high fee tx over a high priority tx?
Mon Mar 07 02:26:27 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> fee is not required if inputs are sufficiently old enough, which in this case they appear to have been