Matches for danielpbarron, 10234 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sat Feb 13 05:12:09 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> that's more of a WoT thing than a block chain thing, and we're back to betters beating losers
Sat Feb 13 05:06:31 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> blockchain_enthu, I'd re-voice you but I can't think of anything else of interest to add here. If anyone else wants to take a turn...
Sat Feb 13 05:02:05 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> "this smart contract says x" "so what?" *clubs head*
Sat Feb 13 05:01:26 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> the one thing the block chain can do is move arbitrary numbers between arbitrary addresses and this works because it all exists totally within itself. The problem with trying to mesh this with things not-in-the-block-chain is that they do not have to obey the rules set forth therein
Sat Feb 13 04:56:13 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> here's another part of the log that seems relevant to your station >> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=10-02-2016#1402512 << and funny thing is I'm currently watching The Matrix as we speak
Sat Feb 13 04:53:04 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> do you know the private key to any addresses with unspent outputs?
Sat Feb 13 04:52:15 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> do you have a bitcoin node?
Sat Feb 13 04:49:17 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> !gettrust blockchain_enthu
Sat Feb 13 04:49:08 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> the key word there is 'somebody' and right now you ain't that
Sat Feb 13 04:47:13 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> that and every other half-baked idea to "do x but this time with blockchain technowlogeez"
Sat Feb 13 04:46:44 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i think that pretty well sums it up
Sat Feb 13 04:44:51 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> aha found it!
Sat Feb 13 04:40:33 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> i'm trying to find the part in the log where this idea was proposed and shot down
Sat Feb 13 04:37:47 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> like what?
Sat Feb 13 04:37:25 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> but the implication is that there could exist a block chain without the money part
Sat Feb 13 04:36:34 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> what do you mean, block chain more interesting? How are the two separate?
Sat Feb 13 04:32:40 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> no problem, who are you?
Sat Feb 13 04:32:26 UTC 2016 <blockchain_enthu> Thanks danielpbarron
Sat Feb 13 04:31:21 UTC 2016 <danielpbarron> !up blockchain_enthu