Matches for ddos, 848 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Sep 09 20:29:35 UTC 2015 <jurov> and thus can shrug any ddos
Wed Sep 09 20:28:13 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> most ddos is pipe exhaustion not cpu exhaustion.
Wed Sep 09 20:27:29 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> wait, you wanted cpu-based ddos ?
Wed Sep 09 20:26:31 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> jurov consider the experimentally verified, and publicly at that, fact that ddos couldn't do any appreciabvle harm to qntra, or trilema.
Wed Sep 09 20:25:07 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> trinque, jurov: if device which silently drops unsigned (or signed by unblessed) packets straight on the floor were mass-produced and inexpensive, ddos as a thing ends.
Wed Sep 09 20:22:22 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> ddos only works a) briefly and b) on large targets.
Sun Sep 06 22:04:36 UTC 2015 <punkman> mircea_popescu: sure, but can't sysadmin the box it lives on (and don't want to fight ddos other than making application cache better and whatnot)
Fri Sep 04 17:23:19 UTC 2015 <assbot> XT Node Blacklists Fail to Prevent DDoS Attack | Qntra ... ( http://bit.ly/1N7O0oW )
Fri Sep 04 17:23:18 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> ascii_field mircea_popescu: http://qntra.net/2015/09/xt-node-blacklists-fail-to-prevent-ddos-attack/#comment-51115
Fri Sep 04 13:42:32 UTC 2015 <assbot> XT Node Blacklists Fail to Prevent DDoS Attack | Qntra ... ( http://bit.ly/1JH0sKb )
Fri Sep 04 13:42:31 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu et al: http://qntra.net/2015/09/xt-node-blacklists-fail-to-prevent-ddos-attack/#comment-51035
Fri Sep 04 05:45:43 UTC 2015 <deedbot-> [Qntra] XT Node Blacklists Fail to Prevent DDoS Attack - http://qntra.net/2015/09/xt-node-blacklists-fail-to-prevent-ddos-attack/
Thu Sep 03 21:24:39 UTC 2015 <kakobrekla> My nodes got hit with 25 GBit/sec. The university firewall handled it like a pro, but I was forced to shut off my nodes. Due to the security implications (I guess DDoS attacks are a security risk now?) I'll have to fight to get them back up again.
Wed Sep 02 12:29:35 UTC 2015 <davout> they apparently want to admit that "my crowd is behind the XT DDoS"
Mon Aug 31 21:48:23 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> dbus needs network connectivity to maintain a list of ddos ips.
Mon Aug 31 09:36:32 UTC 2015 <assbot> UDP flood DDoS attacks against XT nodes | Hacker News ... ( http://bit.ly/1Q2XPV9 )
Sun Aug 30 18:32:03 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> for extra clarity: 'ddos sources' as in senders of the packets, or what is meant is 'ddos holes' ?
Sun Aug 30 18:30:01 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> the ddos sources don't simply exist, like rocks. they were put there, like roads.
Sun Aug 30 18:29:33 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: what in this case is 'coopted' ? even a tree stump can see that the buggers love to ddos
Sun Aug 30 18:02:05 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=30-08-2015#1256545 << "ddos protection" being used so liberally to mask specifically nsa-ian idiocy strengthens my suspicion that "ddos" does not merely exist, but is in fact a coopted technologee. which is why fucking automattic ACTUASLLY PUTS IT IN DELIBERATELY.