Matches for ddos, 848 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
26-09-2016 14:10:02 <funkenstein_> perhaps there are better ddos targets out there
26-09-2016 13:54:48 <funkenstein_> http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/09/why-the-silencing-of-krebsonsecurity-opens-a-troubling-chapter-for-the-net/ <-- one amusing thing is that this ddos didn' t in any way hurt krebs or slow disemination of any information
23-09-2016 06:09:44 <punkman> "Akamai dumps Brian Krebs website over sustained DDoS attack"
22-09-2016 17:43:07 <punkman> "The network is under attack. The attack is a computational DDoS, ie. miners and nodes need to spend a very long time processing some blocks. This is due to the EXTCODESIZE opcode, which has a fairly low gasprice but which requires nodes to read state information from disk; the attack transactions are calling this opcode roughly 50,000 times per block"
21-08-2016 15:56:52 <kakobrekla> well assbot was over 3 servers back in the ddos days
12-08-2016 14:15:08 <funkenstein_> it looks like a reasonable way to organize a ddos.. not as a long-lived coin but more like a torrent - built for a specific site
10-08-2016 15:51:21 <kakobrekla> perhaps is not such a bad idea to hide mine behind a node to hide from ddos
10-08-2016 15:43:59 <asciilifeform> kakobrekla: understand, unsigned packets more or less means that 1) whoever controls your path from a to b, can break the connection or inject rubbish 2) you are reliant on prayer and the mercy of the gods, and, just as uselessly, 'security by obscurity', against ddos
10-08-2016 15:32:20 <asciilifeform> the fundamental fabric of ddos is the 'something for nothing' idiocy
10-08-2016 15:30:47 <funkenstein_> fair enough, there's no stopping a brute force tcp ddos is there
10-08-2016 15:22:19 <funkenstein_> i guess it provides more leverage as a ddos tool, but not for spoofing back to client which would require LAN access
24-05-2016 15:24:09 <kakobrekla> its how i implemented some of the anti-ddos features - need logs for that
24-05-2016 14:10:23 <asciilifeform> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=24-05-2016#1448401 << betacha kakobrekla also thinks ddos of trilema, mpex, bbet, et al was own goal?
29-04-2016 07:45:11 <kakobrekla> the 1mb limit was done later as ddos protection or some such
18-03-2016 21:44:40 <mircea_popescu> next they'll be able to ddos.
18-03-2016 05:03:45 <ben_vulpes> bitbet under ddos?
17-03-2016 17:02:36 <davout> danielpbarron: i reddit'd your piece for increased pogotron ddos lulz
07-03-2016 23:34:12 <mircea_popescu> in any case : some degree of proxying is absolutely unavoidable in bitcoin relay , because ... ddos.
« Previous Page Next Page »