home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for deedbot, 3217 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Sun Aug 16 00:09:25 UTC 2015  <deedbot->   accepted: 1

Sun Aug 16 00:09:22 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   deedbot- http://dpaste.com/3HC5S7V.txt

Sun Aug 16 00:03:21 UTC 2015  <deedbot->   accepted: 1

Sun Aug 16 00:03:20 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   deedbot- http://dpaste.com/1BM4C5Y.txt

Wed Aug 12 10:46:12 UTC 2015  <shinohai>   guvment efficiency. Notarize with deedbot or something.

Fri Aug 07 18:50:57 UTC 2015  <deedbot->   accepted: 1

Fri Aug 07 18:50:55 UTC 2015  <danielpbarron>   deedbot- http://danielpbarron.com/xmacro.tar.gz.sha512.asc.txt

Fri Aug 07 16:55:04 UTC 2015  <King_Rex>   lurker, very interested in deedbot and the bitcoin foundation and your node efforts

Thu Aug 06 16:04:59 UTC 2015  <shinohai>   trinque: does deedbot run on limnoria ?

Thu Aug 06 16:01:17 UTC 2015  <trinque>   Adlai | trinque: where exactly is deedbot-'s source? << on my laptop and a server, no shithub to be found

Thu Aug 06 11:17:30 UTC 2015  <deedbot->   accepted: 1

Thu Aug 06 11:17:28 UTC 2015  <kakobrekla>   deedbot-: http://dpaste.com/1JRE9WM.txt

Thu Aug 06 11:11:20 UTC 2015  <deedbot->   Bad URL or network outage.

Thu Aug 06 11:11:18 UTC 2015  <Adlai>   deedbot-: http://dpaste.com/1JRE9WM

Thu Aug 06 09:01:46 UTC 2015  <Adlai>   trinque: where exactly is deedbot-'s source?

Thu Aug 06 02:05:12 UTC 2015  <mod6>   on the other side of the coin, if we do something like this with deedbot, we need to ensure a mirror is always available.

Thu Aug 06 02:04:43 UTC 2015  <mod6>   so i guess all in all, the deedbot solution, if it can be created, seems better than my initial proposal of 2 mailing lists; one for everything, one for patches accepted only. which seems simple as well, but now we have to manage two lists.

Thu Aug 06 01:59:21 UTC 2015  <mod6>   that way it sort of also solves the problem of keeping track of who signed which patch. since deedbot stores these sigs in a horizontal fashion next to the address.

Thu Aug 06 01:55:55 UTC 2015  <mod6>   but what if we then, say, at the end of a testing/release cycle were to (instead of signing or as well as posting to the mailing list) post the plaintext patch and a detach signature from the originating author, myself & ben to deedbot as a perm storage for these patches?

Wed Aug 05 22:35:26 UTC 2015  <mod6>   well and probably error prone if he/she has to cut the upper text out just to get down to "bare" patch to re-clearsign and submit to deedbot... could miss line, something bad.

« Previous Page    Next Page »