home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for deedbot, 3217 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Wed Aug 05 22:30:06 UTC 2015  <jurov>   having an option to tell deedbot "present these together on one page" should suffice

Wed Aug 05 22:28:16 UTC 2015  <ascii_field>   throw hashes in deedbot, sure. or even uuencodes. but to make it a canonical repository of anything else, is a microscope-hammer.

Wed Aug 05 22:26:29 UTC 2015  <jurov>   or otherwise suggest to deedbot they're related

Wed Aug 05 22:25:27 UTC 2015  <mod6>   ok so another question i have about the deedbot way.. would be: if we submit a patch to deedbot, how do we tie a message to that same submission? say we wanna be like "Hey, this thing is neat!" Will it need to reference anothe deedbot submission or does the patch have to come after our statment in the clearsigned message?

Wed Aug 05 21:56:09 UTC 2015  <mod6>   and honestly, this is no poor reflection on deedbot. the thing is cool.

Wed Aug 05 21:49:03 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   if it stays as a ml, becomes a wiki, somehow otherwise including deedbot or not changes i do not care per se

Wed Aug 05 21:27:47 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 05-08-2015 18:54:25; mod6: if our idea is to clearsign patches and then submit them to deedbot, i urge you all to review this email and consider why that doesn't work:

Wed Aug 05 21:10:25 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 05-08-2015 17:15:51; ascii_field: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=05-08-2015#1225798 << how do i embed ~unmutilatable~ binaries in deedbot? uuencode ?!!!

Wed Aug 05 20:49:48 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   mike_c anyway ima link to deedbot just as soon as it pops.

Wed Aug 05 20:45:43 UTC 2015  <deedbot->   accepted: 1

Wed Aug 05 20:45:41 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   deedbot- http://dpaste.com/2Y7KA8E.txt

Wed Aug 05 19:25:11 UTC 2015  <jurov>   yes that one is solved. but deedbot can be used only if clearsigned and without any accompanying text

Wed Aug 05 19:11:05 UTC 2015  <mod6>   anyway, the main point i wanted to bring up re: clearsigned patches into deedbot was this email: http://thebitcoin.foundation/ml/btc-dev/2015-July/000136.html

Wed Aug 05 19:10:21 UTC 2015  <mod6>   it still doesn't help me view a base64 encoded submission to the deedbot

Wed Aug 05 19:02:45 UTC 2015  <danielpbarron>   deedbot isn't where you go to read it all; it's where you go to verify it all

Wed Aug 05 19:01:29 UTC 2015  <mod6>   that's fine, but what if I just wanna look through the submitted patches in deedbot? i now have to do a bunch of extra gyrations to even see the text

Wed Aug 05 18:57:24 UTC 2015  <trinque>   was merely saying I am willing to put in the work *should* deedbot- be some part of it

Wed Aug 05 18:57:06 UTC 2015  <trinque>   I gotta depart to a meeting, but to summarize I have no strong opinion that deedbot is the solution

Wed Aug 05 18:57:04 UTC 2015  <ascii_field>   deedbot as adjunct to ml - works

Wed Aug 05 18:56:27 UTC 2015  <mod6>   will deedbot take 2 parameters, a non-signed .patch file and a detached signature and somehow colese them?

« Previous Page    Next Page »