Matches for deedbot, 3217 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sat Jan 24 00:04:21 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> tell her to stick it deedbot
Mon Jan 19 18:02:38 UTC 2015 <davout> if someone pops in here one day and says "o i can't pick up deedbot's crumbs anymore" you have a problem somewhere
Mon Jan 19 18:01:46 UTC 2015 <Apocalyptic> so you would not want deedbot to take it back
Mon Jan 19 18:01:16 UTC 2015 <davout> Apocalyptic: by deedbot
Mon Jan 19 17:37:46 UTC 2015 <davout> ben_vulpes: you might just as well spend that back to deedbot's wallet by broadcasting a second transaction at the same time
Mon Jan 19 17:36:39 UTC 2015 <davout> also there was another thing regarding deedbot, if all deeds are simply concatenated before being hashed into a bitcoin private key, that means anyone watching the process taking place can deduce the bitcoin private key that's going to be generated, and claim the coins that'll be sent there
Mon Jan 19 17:32:01 UTC 2015 <Apocalyptic> davout sounds right, deedbot can verify a payment was made to that address and hence include it retrospectively
Mon Jan 19 17:27:54 UTC 2015 <davout> BingoBoingo: sure, but if your timestamping respects deedbot's spec just get it included along
Mon Jan 19 17:26:45 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> But part of the deedbot appeal is also hosting the deeds as a stronger pastebin/dpaste alternative.
Mon Jan 19 17:25:55 UTC 2015 <davout> you can just sha256 your content, make an address out of that, send a bitcent there, and since that's how deedbot is supposed to work, you get your stuff deedbot-timestamped before deedbot even exists
Mon Jan 19 17:24:11 UTC 2015 <davout> BingoBoingo: you can already timestamp some stuff and get deedbot to accept it later as previously timestamped, that is, if the bundle structure is already defined
Mon Jan 19 17:22:52 UTC 2015 <*> BingoBoingo thinks this could have been a perfect use of deedbot
Sun Jan 18 21:48:54 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> undata davout so was one of you two picking up deedbot ?
Sun Jan 18 01:01:09 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> so that someone in 3714, with nothing but an inscription of deedbot's deeds, can verify our contracts just as well as we can.
Sun Jan 18 00:58:29 UTC 2015 <davout> say i want to timestamp a contract i made with someone also in the L2 group as nested clearsigns, i doesn't really matter which signature is checked by deedbot, right?
Sun Jan 18 00:37:39 UTC 2015 <davout> why do you absolutely want to shoehorn your conception of a notary into deedbot?
Sun Jan 18 00:36:14 UTC 2015 <davout> why the hell would it need deedbot to testify to that too ?
Sun Jan 18 00:35:18 UTC 2015 <davout> undata: you fail to comprehend that it's not deedbot's job to certify to a third party that the contract is signed by an identified party, gpg already does that
Sun Jan 18 00:32:09 UTC 2015 <davout> anyway, my point wrt to deedbot is that it's supposed to be used by ppl with L1/L2 trust, it doesn't need to check gpg signatures, so let anyone with +v in -assets use it, do away with the requirement that a keyid belonging to someone in assbot's wot be presented or maliciously hammered into the message
Sun Jan 18 00:28:33 UTC 2015 <davout> the crux is 'verified keys', if deedbot doesn't maintain a full keyring at all times it can't pull fingerprints