home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for deeds, 422 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Fri May 08 20:44:59 UTC 2015  <trinque>   that's not going to work; deeds are on static hosting on s3

Fri May 08 20:44:39 UTC 2015  <kakobrekla>   the way to handle it is to have an a record pointing to deeds servers ip

Fri May 08 20:43:55 UTC 2015  <kakobrekla>   last time someone asked me to do a perma redirect from deeds. to deedbot.org which I did

Fri May 08 20:06:48 UTC 2015  <kakobrekla>   i dont have access to deeds server

Mon Apr 13 01:42:40 UTC 2015  <trinque>   ben_vulpes: the old deeds bundle hashes are a hash of each deed comma-delimited, then hashed again all together

Sat Apr 11 19:32:36 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   at the same time...it's la serenissima's list of deeds. the notary in question is somewhat irrelevant.

Sat Apr 11 19:21:33 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   those deeds were published in certain blocks

Sat Apr 11 19:18:31 UTC 2015  <trinque>   ben_vulpes: as I understand it I'll just take the old deeds and re-bundle them?

Sat Apr 11 19:17:29 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   ey trinque, d'you have time to get the legacy deeds in this weekend?

Thu Apr 09 02:25:48 UTC 2015  <trinque>   punkman: hey dude, what's the encoding of the old deeds table's deed field?

Thu Apr 09 02:10:53 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   trinque: i need those legacy deeds in deedbot.

Wed Apr 08 14:03:51 UTC 2015  <nubbins`>   but yeah. deeds dating back to the early 80s for this property

Mon Mar 23 11:12:13 UTC 2015  <davout>   trinque: just wanted to see who'd actually read the deeds :)

Thu Mar 19 21:58:12 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 19-03-2015 17:54:20; mod6: is anyone working on porting over the original submitted deeds to the new deedbot?

Thu Mar 19 17:54:20 UTC 2015  <mod6>   is anyone working on porting over the original submitted deeds to the new deedbot?

Tue Mar 17 03:26:03 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   danielpbarron he can of course point to deedbot deeds proving these claims,

Mon Mar 16 20:45:12 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 16-03-2015 19:18:07; davout: question mainly being: can some random derp take already notarized deeds, and clog the pipes with them, because i assume deedbot will listen privately to deeds being submitted, as long as they're signed with a proper key amirite

Mon Mar 16 19:20:53 UTC 2015  <Adlai>   does it only accept deeds from authed members of L1/2 ?

Mon Mar 16 19:20:15 UTC 2015  <trinque>   davout: it will only eat deeds signed by assbot's L1 or L2

Mon Mar 16 19:18:07 UTC 2015  <davout>   question mainly being: can some random derp take already notarized deeds, and clog the pipes with them, because i assume deedbot will listen privately to deeds being submitted, as long as they're signed with a proper key amirite

« Previous Page    Next Page »