Matches for diana_coman, 488 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
01-04-2016 23:22:04 <scoopbot> New post on Ossasepia by Diana Coman: http://www.dianacoman.com/2016/04/02/the-coolest-guide-to-coolness-riches-ginger-and-spice/
28-03-2016 23:58:25 <diana_coman> I can see the interpretation you suggest asciilifeform
28-03-2016 23:57:06 <asciilifeform> diana_coman: in my view, the reactor test had two specific and distinct phases - the doublespend, and the aftermath
28-03-2016 23:56:23 <asciilifeform> diana_coman: i meant simply that it is imho a very productive and logical thing for a mircea_popescu to do
28-03-2016 23:55:58 <diana_coman> I readily admit anything is possible but I am quite specifically avoiding this "in his place" since it never ever really holds - unless you can also be him
28-03-2016 23:54:43 <asciilifeform> diana_coman: quite possibly.
28-03-2016 23:54:21 <diana_coman> hm, asciilifeform if I get it right, you consider that he staged the whole thing precisely to obtain a split and make it clear who is who?
28-03-2016 23:52:47 <asciilifeform> ty diana_coman - http://www.dianacoman.com/2016/03/28/when-the-messenger-shoots-back/#comment-246
28-03-2016 23:50:14 <*> diana_coman is reading to refresh the evaporative cooling concept
28-03-2016 23:49:33 <asciilifeform> diana_coman: wanted to learn who the 'true believerz' were ?
28-03-2016 23:48:56 <diana_coman> kakobrekla, that's quite my point: he has a history of paying for what he fucks up and owning up to it so ...why now?
28-03-2016 23:48:19 <assbot> Logged on 28-03-2016 23:44:54; diana_coman: what I can't somehow see is a. how/why would this make sense all of a sudden b. what is exactly his gain out of this in any outcome (so even assuming you would have signed the statement and bitbet would still go on)
28-03-2016 23:45:32 <diana_coman> yes asciilifeform , it just broke now, at the best possible moment, I was just digging through it to find what did wp do now :(
28-03-2016 23:45:11 <asciilifeform> diana_coman: i keep showing up as 'anon'
28-03-2016 23:45:05 <kakobrekla> diana_coman there were other cases where he fucked up but he paid for it because he understood it was his liability. just as if i nuke the bitbet server i do not expect for him to help it set back up.
28-03-2016 23:45:02 <asciilifeform> diana_coman: your blog has broken comment box
28-03-2016 23:44:54 <diana_coman> what I can't somehow see is a. how/why would this make sense all of a sudden b. what is exactly his gain out of this in any outcome (so even assuming you would have signed the statement and bitbet would still go on)
28-03-2016 23:43:12 <diana_coman> it's even before that: if you doubt his competence, even before any loss, it's still a full stop to the whole venture, as I can't see how that would work
28-03-2016 23:41:44 <diana_coman> kakobrekla, if I thought he hallucinated away x btc as you say (no matter the amount), I'd certainly get out of it, that's not the issue here in any way
28-03-2016 23:29:31 <diana_coman> you mean hard to question in general or on the specific details of this (I mean specifically the intelligence claimed to support the miner cartel)
Next Page »