home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for exclusive, 199 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Sat Jun 14 04:38:35 UTC 2014  <RainMan28>   mircea_popescu: dat exclusive level 2 wot

Sun Jun 08 20:48:25 UTC 2014  <jurov>   also, slovak national bank did it by declaring all virtual currency transactions to be exclusive domain of transacting parties.

Mon Jun 02 10:50:56 UTC 2014  <fluffypony>   ok nubbins` better idea - how about on the back you put "First. Biggest. Only. Best. Exclusive."

Mon Jun 02 10:45:53 UTC 2014  <jurov>   i can always switch it to "The First And Only Exclusive Coolness" shit

Mon May 12 01:53:44 UTC 2014  <benkay>   one might go so far as to say that listing on mpex and incorporating in the states are mutually exclusive at this time.

Mon May 12 00:27:56 UTC 2014  <assbot>   EXCLUSIVE: Christie officials gave millions in public funds to VC firm, despite “pay to play” rules | PandoDaily

Sun May 11 07:30:31 UTC 2014  <bitcoinpete>   punkman: i thought .coms were the pricey, and therefore exclusive, ones

Sun May 11 07:28:25 UTC 2014  <assbot>   .RICH | The World's Most Exclusive Address

Thu May 08 13:13:45 UTC 2014  <jurov>   capital for new game development on an exclusive title & platform

Wed May 07 01:39:09 UTC 2014  <benkay>   the opportunities in -assets are almost entirely bitcoin exclusive.

Tue May 06 14:27:53 UTC 2014  <ozbot>   Exclusive: Emails reveal close Google relationship with NSA | Al Jazeera America

Sun May 04 23:56:23 UTC 2014  <benkay>   coding is exclusive, y'assholes

Fri May 02 20:02:54 UTC 2014  <bitcoinpete>   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/exclusive-pfizer-insider-warns-that-takeover-of-astrazeneca-could-be-devastating-9318884.html << £63 billion. heavy

Sun Apr 27 23:19:40 UTC 2014  <mike_c>   idk. 'sole proprietor' and 'public corporation' are mutually exclusive, no?

Sat Apr 12 13:35:33 UTC 2014  <bounce>   the existence of elites, at least the part where some people are regarded as "better" than others in some sort of fancy or other, is not bad by and of itself. the problems arise (and I'd surmise egalitarians' complaints partly stem from this) when people work on shutting out other people on essentially arbitrary grounds so as to, well, keep the thing exclusive in ways quite disconnected from the original merit

Sat Apr 12 12:43:24 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   "Markus Persson @notch ? 1h I got an invitation to this cool sounding exclusive "important people talk to each other and change the world" thing. I make games. Games." << twasn't me.

Wed Apr 09 20:27:20 UTC 2014  <ozbot>   Snowden Speaks: A Vanity Fair Exclusive | Vanity Fair

Fri Apr 04 16:57:43 UTC 2014  <cmyers>   agnostic and atheist are not mutually exclusive

Wed Apr 02 19:50:46 UTC 2014  <diametric>   punkman: direct drive and bowden are not mutually exclusive

Tue Apr 01 19:35:49 UTC 2014  <Namworld>   I'm not sure how such a system would work to actually prevent fraud. Unless that system had exclusive amangement of funds. But then running a business would be close of impossible if all money spent needs to be approved by shareholders.

« Previous Page    Next Page »