home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for fits-in-head, 106 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Thu Sep 10 04:34:34 UTC 2015  <pete_dushenski>   university was 'fits in head'

Wed Sep 09 19:15:55 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 09-09-2015 11:39:38; asciilifeform: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=09-09-2015#1267236 << the path to fits-in-head STRICTLY depends on every particular thing on the machine being implemented ONCE. this includes lexer, parser, related items.

Wed Sep 09 11:39:38 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=09-09-2015#1267236 << the path to fits-in-head STRICTLY depends on every particular thing on the machine being implemented ONCE. this includes lexer, parser, related items.

Sun Sep 06 05:09:51 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   this means fits-in-head.

Fri Sep 04 17:32:24 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   "fits in head" is a realistic goal with python, perl and cpp?

Tue Sep 01 19:12:21 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   fits in head

Fri Aug 28 03:36:40 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   <trinque> really illustrates your "fits in head" << i've seen his codework before and was very pleasantly impressed.

Fri Aug 28 03:19:05 UTC 2015  <trinque>   really illustrates your "fits in head"

Thu Aug 27 17:56:35 UTC 2015  <ascii_field>   mats: i have often named historical examples of 'fits in head.' but you choose to ignore them. why ?

Thu Aug 27 17:48:25 UTC 2015  <mats>   and then there's the much less measurable thing i presume you're talking about, which is those leaks that result from 'fits in head'

Thu Aug 27 00:55:27 UTC 2015  <*>   asciilifeform has very little patience for peddlers of 'hardenings,' 'mitigations,' and other so-called 'solutions' which are guaranteed to advance the pestilence of non-fits-in-head

Thu Aug 20 20:15:25 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   "fits in head" too ?

Thu Aug 13 16:49:50 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   the ultimate systemic solution is 'fits-in-head'

Sun Aug 09 20:35:20 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   seems as if they are even abolishing 'busybox' in favour of something 'fits-in-head'-flavoured

Sat Aug 08 00:11:09 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   the book (lovingly referred to as sicp, 'sick pee') is a textbook illustration of precisely what i mean when i say 'fits in head'.

Sat Aug 08 00:07:36 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   scheme 'fits in head.'

Sun Aug 02 22:33:39 UTC 2015  <punkman>   asciilifeform: all works of man are either 'fits in head' or 'pile of shit', no exceptions << don't some things require more than a single head?

Sun Aug 02 22:13:58 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   all works of man are either 'fits in head' or 'pile of shit', no exceptions

Mon Jul 20 02:23:06 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   the answer is ALWAYS, without exception, fits-in-head+does-not-crash+operates-correctly.

Fri Jun 05 06:10:26 UTC 2015  <ben_vulpes>   lathe fits in head.

« Previous Page    Next Page »