Matches for from:ThickAsThieves, 44781 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Thu Sep 11 16:25:32 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> it continues to say shareholders get to vote on this move, (not bondholders)
Thu Sep 11 16:24:55 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> get this: "CM was described as a "virtual company” by LTC-Global (and accordingly referred to as such in the CM Business Plan). However, as a matter of English law, CM may be considered a general partnership. If that is the case, then the 'shareholders' of CM - which includes yourself - would all be considered partners. As partners, they would all be jointly and severally liable for
Thu Sep 11 16:24:55 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> CM's debts, including the 'Bond'. It is therefore possible that 'bondholders' may seek to take legal action against CM's 'shareholders', including yourself, to seek to recover that debt. However, if 'bondholders' accept the restructure plan proposed below, that risk might be mitigated."
Thu Sep 11 16:08:34 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> looks like some gnarly stuff
Thu Sep 11 15:57:18 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> last div was in March, heh
Thu Sep 11 15:56:46 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> does AM even pay divs anymore?
Thu Sep 11 15:50:41 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> <+mircea_popescu> anyway, ThickAsThieves The Strategy of Conflict, old book. /// will check it out
Thu Sep 11 15:49:05 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> <+punkman> if only we had 14 spare MPs sitting around /// oh lord!
Thu Sep 11 15:47:57 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> house, nurturing powers like overgrown weeds that now appear to make up the whole lawn.
Thu Sep 11 15:47:56 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> <+mircea_popescu> kolinko no. the system can break itself, too. it doesn't need a mustachioed antropomorphised enemy. /// glad to see you say so, it's a point often missed in many circumstances. for example, some want to paint USG as a hyper conspiracy and assume all its evil/scammy actions are fully intentional. More likely, it just evolved to be a broken shit in all corners of its
Thu Sep 11 14:51:57 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> i know the concept, but how do i see the point?
Thu Sep 11 14:51:36 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> only light exposure
Thu Sep 11 14:50:41 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> so at first i was frustrated at this 1bTCXE trading challenge because basically what it is is they gave everyone a fake account with half BTC / half USD credits and people are set wild to trade the assets. However, there is no tie to the real market so it's mostly a psychological/economical experiment. In this case, is there theory on how such a market would play out?
Thu Sep 11 14:47:41 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> people will try anything if youre wearing the right clothes
Thu Sep 11 14:47:05 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> not ideals or such
Thu Sep 11 14:47:01 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> these are just system design factors
Thu Sep 11 14:46:48 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> for me, arguing against centralization as a broad value is silly
Thu Sep 11 14:46:03 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> hehe