Matches for from:asciilifeform, 112685 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sat Dec 10 23:56:14 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> (nor will kakobrekla have anything to pay with if he loses...)
Sat Dec 10 23:55:47 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> kakobrekla: your prediction has been noted! i'd offer to bbet even!111 but haven't bbet.
Sat Dec 10 23:55:08 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> i, fwiw, also crackpot, etc.
Sat Dec 10 23:54:56 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> jurov: whether d00d is a crackpot, or knows his arse from his elbow, are entirely separate questions.
Sat Dec 10 23:54:24 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> same gambit failed, however, for germany, whose inflatable tank park ended up 'flattened' famously by single wooden bomb from britain. because the tank park was implausible.
Sat Dec 10 23:53:17 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> and opponent with ~infinite money.
Sat Dec 10 23:53:13 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> despite ~0 working nuke.
Sat Dec 10 23:53:02 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> hruschev, incidentally, won that one.
Sat Dec 10 23:52:43 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> if fork-but-no-nuke -- then we learn that kakobrekla was right, and mp was hruschev, who -- at this point i think is well-known -- had a total of 2 rockets at the time of cuban crisis (and neither, likely, worked)
Sat Dec 10 23:51:40 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> i haven't, again, any reason to think that mp-has-with-what, other than indirect clues (d00d was buying at $1, and was by any reasonable measure pretty loaded) aaaaaand no-fork-yet.
Sat Dec 10 23:50:23 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> the 'use' requires a chain split
Sat Dec 10 23:46:34 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> whole reason why 'nuke' is the model here, is that there is no way to know who has what, until it goes off.
Sat Dec 10 23:45:21 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> 'oh he didn't for 18, so he hasn't with what'
Sat Dec 10 23:45:05 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> or is jurov playing stupid.
Sat Dec 10 23:44:59 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> and not for pocket change
Sat Dec 10 23:44:53 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> jurov: if btc as a whole is being sunk , from his pov, by a successful chain fork, then it makes logical sense to launch the nuke
Sat Dec 10 23:44:07 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> ( if he had done it deliberately, probably would have by now explained wtf )
Sat Dec 10 23:42:44 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> i say - mistake
Sat Dec 10 23:41:59 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> (the 0fee tx)
Sat Dec 10 23:41:57 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> jurov: from my reading, everything from item 1 was attempt to fix the mistake of item 0