home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for from:asciilifeform, 112685 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Mon Nov 07 17:15:16 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   who can tell themselves a story about being legit passengers 'just like others' etc.

Mon Nov 07 17:15:03 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   then there are the 'roof riders'.

Mon Nov 07 17:14:58 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   there is 'the train', e.g., coin limit, block reward decay, prohibition on basic double spend, etc.

Mon Nov 07 17:14:10 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   ditto with the 'anyone can spend' idiocy.

Mon Nov 07 17:14:01 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   not from trb's pov

Mon Nov 07 17:10:18 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   but considerably less (how much less, is difficult to say) for demolition of 'soft forks'.

Mon Nov 07 17:10:04 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   funkenstein_: you need sustained 51% for complete demolition of the protocol

Mon Nov 07 17:06:35 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   if your yield is funneled into purchasing/bribing/threatening miners - it holds.

Mon Nov 07 17:05:26 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   if the potential yield from annihilating the timelocks is sufficiently above the cost (incl. the opportunity cost of simply mining 'normally') it will fire.

Mon Nov 07 17:02:45 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   that'd be too short -- by definition

Mon Nov 07 17:00:23 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   what about it ?

Mon Nov 07 16:59:48 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   which is why there is not particularly much kept in these.

Mon Nov 07 16:59:34 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   one could, for instance, drain all of the 'timelocked' crud with considerably less than 51%, and reasonably short burst.

Mon Nov 07 16:58:34 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   the reason why 'timelock', 'segwit', etc. are roof-riders on the train is that these misfeatures require gentleman's agreement among miners (and considerably more than the customary 51%) to refuse to mine certain broad classes of tx, for the misfeature to continue working

Mon Nov 07 16:55:00 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   all you need is a relatively modest hammer, to whack the 'segwit' thing into chain divergence.

Mon Nov 07 16:54:00 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   so mr. long dong, of shanghai, goes & spends.

Mon Nov 07 16:52:06 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   fork war.

Mon Nov 07 16:52:04 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   so i go & spend.

Mon Nov 07 16:51:37 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   punkman: your node relays tx without a valid signature ?!

Mon Nov 07 16:49:11 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   aha. quite different thing.

« Previous Page    Next Page »