home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for from:asciilifeform, 112685 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Fri Sep 23 17:32:49 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   it isn't even uninteresting.

Fri Sep 23 17:32:45 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   punkman: i've been reading for a while.

Fri Sep 23 15:29:47 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1719 << yours truly on the subj of krebs.

Thu Sep 22 17:06:25 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   ask'em.

Thu Sep 22 17:01:22 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   punkman: so says the linked piece.

Wed Sep 21 17:34:28 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   heil clitler.

Thu Sep 15 18:19:04 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   entertaining variation on the old 'physical coin' theme.

Thu Sep 15 18:18:35 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   aha.

Thu Sep 15 18:16:41 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   buy same micro, load patched fw.

Thu Sep 15 18:16:30 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   which is why presumably it was not posted.

Thu Sep 15 18:16:25 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   well, having their source would save work.

Thu Sep 15 18:13:34 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   with or without the vendor's collusion.

Thu Sep 15 18:13:24 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   fact is, it is not difficult to make 'counterfeit' (behaves and looks precisely like the original) 'opendime' where i know the privkey.

Thu Sep 15 18:12:11 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   consider, 'Can I re-seal after breaking the center? No. A permanent change is made inside the flash memory of the processor.' << which i can't remove and replace with identical-looking one, containing same procedure, exactly why...?

Thu Sep 15 18:11:59 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   but it is rather besides the point, the entire item is an attempt to 'make water non-wet'

Thu Sep 15 18:11:43 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   correct. manufacturer can collude with a scammer to allow him to load units with known privkeys.

Thu Sep 15 18:05:40 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   https://github.com/opendime/opendime/blob/master/unsealed/advanced/rngverify.py << if you read this, it is trivially obvious that the manufacturer can trivially supply a secret (presumably a pill against their rng) that would allow a user to silently spend the contents of a 'sealed' drive.

Thu Sep 15 18:01:17 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   srsly these always go ~same way. 'we PROMISE that our device does XXX. you can PROVE to yourself...' etc. q: 'where's the complete design?' a: ... (or 'fuck off', varies)

Thu Sep 15 18:00:20 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   the source is unpublished. snore.

Thu Sep 15 17:52:01 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   hardcode the payload! then you don't even need the network!1111111111

« Previous Page    Next Page »