Matches for from:mircea_popescu, 253931 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 14 19:35:29 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> "it was in the red whatever asciilifeform would take to babysit 4 years of bitbet and resolve 1.2k bets."
Mon Mar 14 19:35:11 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> solrodar> they chose not to charge it to the company, therefore it didn't count << this is correct. but he's welcome to consider counterfactuals also. just - shouldn't expect me to present factuals for counterfactuals, should write his own story himself!
Mon Mar 14 19:34:21 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> obviously enumerable, impossible to evaluate. and incidentally - how many fucking weekedns omfg!
Mon Mar 14 19:34:02 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform> << just how deeply in the red ~was~ bbet, if we consider this ..? << i dunno man, how much for a night with my slave of your choice ? for me she'll do it for free, you she will not even consider. and this speaks to phf's and other's q as to why assets weren't on the books since they can be trivially enumerated : yes they can be ; but they can't be VALUED. what's the accounting value of bitbet codebase ?
Mon Mar 14 19:34:02 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> or in more at-home terms, what exactly am i going to put phuctor into the s.nsa books as ?
Mon Mar 14 19:32:04 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform> this is the historic norm, when there was no blockchain, only stone knives and bearskins. << yeah, and guess why.
Mon Mar 14 19:31:44 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this is horrible.
Mon Mar 14 19:31:42 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform> which is, to define 'being paid in btc' as 'be shown a valid tx that pays you' << o no fucking way jesus christ.
Mon Mar 14 19:31:20 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform> mircea_popescu described the high-S thing as noncontroversial << wasn't that the other one ?
Mon Mar 14 19:29:26 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> i have nfi how it works, and imho it actually matters for making sense of the observations. << the problem here is that complete transparency can not be achieved for practical reasons. if it could have been, have no doubt i would have preferred to this "under my seal" report avenue.
Mon Mar 14 18:58:10 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> mats the question under audit's not that ; not that it would prevent you from doing whatever.
Mon Mar 14 18:57:21 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform if i didn't think so, the qntra piece would have read "fuck vc sybils already".
Mon Mar 14 18:56:25 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> phf whatever people do with their private funds is their problem, the contract still says the shareholders get it.
Mon Mar 14 18:55:57 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform as a possible explanation.
Mon Mar 14 18:55:17 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> phf it wasn't ?!
Mon Mar 14 18:55:01 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform can i relay directly to miners, or can't i ?
Mon Mar 14 18:54:20 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> can i (one) or can't i (one) ?
Mon Mar 14 18:54:10 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> well so which is it.
Mon Mar 14 18:53:00 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this model of (perceptible relay) + (imperceptible miners) is nonsense of the ilk of meta-nsa-in-the-sky.
Mon Mar 14 18:52:34 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> stat rosa pristina, my dear alf.