home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for from:mircea_popescu, 253931 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Mon Mar 14 10:25:52 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   xm2hi> yeah, and about the ecosystem that Mircea has created. impressive records. << - >> ascii_field> << there will be maxint of these now won't there.

Mon Mar 14 10:25:03 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   but yes, by and large there's a lot of discretionary room for receiver.

Mon Mar 14 10:24:52 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   a "bitbet is in receivership, send no more bets" thing, give it a week or w/e. i doubt the receiver would have to wait out any ongoing bets, can prolly just refund if the reasonable resolution is too far away in the future.

Mon Mar 14 10:24:51 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   pete_dushenski> mircea_popescu: does the bbet receiver have the authority to determine the cut-off date for acceptable wager resolutions and to refund any bets submitted but deemed "too far away" for the receiver to reasonably hold the funds in escrow ? or is this line in the sand to be drawn by you and kakobrekla ? << in general this'd be the receiver's authority. a reasonable path is you know, get the domain, put up

Mon Mar 14 10:21:48 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   <ascii_field> was that the one where operator turned out to be << yes, with the reserve these ex post facto "turned out to be" things deserve.

Mon Mar 14 10:20:24 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   ascii_field> anyone else here read the lee sedol games? << i've looked through.

Sun Mar 13 21:40:59 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   there's been if memory serves exactly one case of delisted company on these grounds, bvps.

Sun Mar 13 21:40:42 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   well, it gotta produce monthly statements. currently we can't do that. mpex wasn't historically very strict with this, but it certainly won't last forever.

Sun Mar 13 21:36:58 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   seems to talk of a.

Sun Mar 13 21:34:14 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   hm ?

Sun Mar 13 21:30:41 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   mats also works, yeah.

Sun Mar 13 21:24:09 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   iirc he did one of the very few clean closedowns in the space

Sun Mar 13 21:23:59 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   maybe dooglus is interested

Sun Mar 13 21:21:38 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   i don't specifically care. as long as the person seems competent... hey.

Sun Mar 13 21:21:05 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   well yeah, if either vetoes very little can be done.

Sun Mar 13 21:20:29 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   course this'd be a senate of two people, but anyway.

Sun Mar 13 21:19:54 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   ben_vulpes i was thinking, interviews. think senate hearings for appointees.

Sun Mar 13 21:19:34 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   even if somehow all the ducks got lined up, it needs some publicity.

Sun Mar 13 21:18:52 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   uh wtf do you mean today lol.

Sun Mar 13 21:18:06 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   his job to make this sorta calls.

« Previous Page    Next Page »