Matches for from:mircea_popescu, 253931 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Mar 23 14:23:00 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> that it seems justified to you may make a difference when you're king of the world and can promise me to appoint all judges forevermore to comply with your notions.
Wed Mar 23 14:21:25 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> much like the tmsr license, bitcoin is deliberately constructed a certain way to destroy fiat notions of this world, not to maintain them nor to permit their maintenance.
Wed Mar 23 14:20:45 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> since when is block reward JUST enrichment ?
Wed Mar 23 14:20:36 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> solrodar there's no bitcoin precedent of "unjust enrichment", and if it is introduced it applies first of all to all miners.
Wed Mar 23 14:08:01 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> and for that matter, are you going to pay out of pocket for the costs anyone and everyone incurs to adapt to this model, like nsa via gavin paid (to their own people) for their 2013 debacle ?
Wed Mar 23 14:06:27 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> really ? nuts!
Wed Mar 23 14:06:24 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> anyway, take it from a software design perspective. you are proposing to change the stateless parser (bet accepted) -> (bet resolved) -> (bet paid out) into a stateful and undefined (bet accepted) -> (bet resolved) -> (???) -> (some thing paid according to some rules you can't know)
Wed Mar 23 14:05:16 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com//?date=07-01-2016#1361806 and prev.
Wed Mar 23 14:03:44 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> funny how everything is in the fucking log. dja recall it davout ?
Wed Mar 23 14:03:35 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this is an eery rehash of the earlier thing re "bitcoin is addresses / no it's txn" where jurov massacred me.
Wed Mar 23 14:02:26 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> give more to the poor, they're worthier.
Wed Mar 23 14:02:20 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> if you are going to make other determinations than who won a bet, might as well put a 50% tax on the richest 10% or w/e the french fashion is these days.
Wed Mar 23 14:00:07 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> you introduced it, really. but i restated the issue more formally and without reference to it.
Wed Mar 23 13:58:34 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> certainly not after the fact.
Wed Mar 23 13:58:20 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> solrodar you may not make assumptions.
Wed Mar 23 13:57:45 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> which is, seal things in the past in such a way they aren't revisable in the future.
Wed Mar 23 13:57:36 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> it is also very visibly, and very risibly, reaction to bitcoin, which is to say a transparent attempt to exactly prevent specifically what bitcoin does,
Wed Mar 23 13:56:43 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this is the ESSENCE of powerrangering.
Wed Mar 23 13:56:37 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> fine, if you absolutely must : suppose owner made an agreement with a third party that the nth txn goes to x and the nth+1 goes to y. are they now bound to revise their agreements on the basis of how you may wish to liberally reinterpret the protocol ?
Wed Mar 23 13:55:54 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> so ?