Matches for from:mircea_popescu, 253931 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 07 16:44:18 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> anyway, ima bbl.
Mon Mar 07 16:43:33 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> by this measure, there's a large overlap between all sorts of things. maybe there is, sure.
Mon Mar 07 16:42:48 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> and then we do this a coupla more times, and so on.
Mon Mar 07 16:42:40 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> let's move on to the next step. THEN, MP broadcast A2, which HAD a fee. to a non-overlapping set of nodes. the disjunction of the two sets had a perfectly valid txn they... also didn't broadcast, because magic reasons.
Mon Mar 07 16:42:12 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> all the outputs go to bet winners.
Mon Mar 07 16:40:30 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> well... if it's not a bettor then "for them A1 credits one of their addresses and so it sticks around forever for them" doesn't stick anymore.
Mon Mar 07 16:38:46 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> as it isn't, per your theory, the case that "Whole world saw". just the set in question.
Mon Mar 07 16:38:22 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this - should be given a %.
Mon Mar 07 16:38:16 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> so far, we're with the assumption that "bettor with incentive was running one or more of the nodes mp connected to".
Mon Mar 07 16:37:54 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> depends what code they run, but this could well be.
Mon Mar 07 16:36:58 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> i thought i had, yes.
Mon Mar 07 16:36:05 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> see, the problem with assumptions is - making them.
Mon Mar 07 16:35:49 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this is integral.
Mon Mar 07 16:35:48 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> except nobody did, somehow.
Mon Mar 07 16:35:09 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> A1.
Mon Mar 07 16:35:08 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> ~nobody saw it, somehow, hence questions about bitbet payouts.
Mon Mar 07 16:34:54 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> at that time, it was yet invisible.
Mon Mar 07 16:34:49 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> HOW did they see it ?
Mon Mar 07 16:34:23 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> also possible.
Mon Mar 07 16:33:14 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> also trivially meets the definition of "withholding txn", but w/e.