Matches for from:mircea_popescu, 253931 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Mar 02 17:07:46 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> part and parcel of how this all works.
Wed Mar 02 17:06:39 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> you think i'd rather have 18 btc than know all this ? i wouldn't.
Wed Mar 02 17:06:21 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> how is it a mistake ?
Wed Mar 02 17:04:25 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> why the fuck is anything. because software sucks ?
Wed Mar 02 17:04:20 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> i distinctly recal trb nearly sunk in the other incident, while mpb provided the magic constants. why was that ?
Wed Mar 02 17:03:48 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> the reward's halving, they regard their capital investment as ~worthless, and we have crossed bitcoin event horizon.
Wed Mar 02 17:03:30 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> other than the obvious "they're getting sloppy" there is, of course, the alternative explanation that the current crop of miners roughly speaking stopped giving a shit.
Wed Mar 02 17:01:32 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> one of the many protocol items that turned to be promises was - i shouldn't NEED any defense.
Wed Mar 02 17:01:16 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> informative heterogenity, however, is not.
Wed Mar 02 17:01:10 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> that wasn't contemplated.
Wed Mar 02 17:00:44 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> sure, in a general sense.
Wed Mar 02 16:59:35 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> if only. protocols would be so much easier to both design and implement, if this were true.
Wed Mar 02 16:58:58 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> what can i say.
Wed Mar 02 16:58:47 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> for this fucking reason.
Wed Mar 02 16:58:44 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> i don't run homogenous stack tho.
Wed Mar 02 16:58:22 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> hey, it's a protocol, right ?
Wed Mar 02 16:57:45 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> myeah.
Wed Mar 02 16:57:01 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> which aren't, at the present time, trb-tethered. it's a goal, but into the future.
Wed Mar 02 16:56:48 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> kakobrekla> one thing that goes through my mind is that trb/mps << this is true, but let me clarify that An set of txn were broadcast through a set of > 1k distinct peers. most of which i don't regard as peers in any sense, but nevertheless they did get to hear about them from my own nodes.
Wed Mar 02 16:55:28 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> so i thought. i dun think so.