Matches for from:mircea_popescu, 253931 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Mar 02 16:26:58 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> ring buffer and all that.
Wed Mar 02 16:26:50 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> punkman iirc no, but the plan was to get the pool sorted by per/kb tx fee
Wed Mar 02 16:26:31 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform looky, this isn't how this sort of discussion works, by giving counterexample.
Wed Mar 02 16:25:16 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> PeterL this is not what was said! didja read the qntra piece ?
Wed Mar 02 16:24:58 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> the miners are running their own shit, and it's centralized.
Wed Mar 02 16:24:46 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> kakobrekla and guess what - trb gets blackholed now and again. prb never mattered.
Wed Mar 02 16:24:31 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> PeterL how is this related to what happened ?
Wed Mar 02 16:23:59 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> kakobrekla or so we thought. but it turns out that no, there's exactly one, covered in a cloud of buzzing shit.
Wed Mar 02 16:23:40 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> PeterL this is miserable "writing down". what are you, a consumer ? HOW do you doublespend.
Wed Mar 02 16:22:17 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> but yes, because "the protocol" is not even written down, endless arguments of this nature can be had. by and large...
Wed Mar 02 16:21:52 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> kakobrekla hey, "spam protection", i didn't write it.
Wed Mar 02 16:21:38 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> write down what a party would need in order to do this.
Wed Mar 02 16:20:40 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> the protocol is that 0 fee txn can't even be relayed.
Wed Mar 02 16:19:35 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> because it's part of a set of mutually incompatible txn, and some of the others have better fees, for instance. if you're am iner, you want the higher fee.
Wed Mar 02 16:18:52 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> it's certainly not a behaviour supported or even possible by any codebase so far published, if you think code=protocol instead.
Wed Mar 02 16:18:31 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> it is breaking the protocol inasmuch as a protocol exists.
Wed Mar 02 16:18:19 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> for a week or so, in preference of higher fee replacements ? sure. why ?
Wed Mar 02 16:17:25 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> nodes advertise the txn they know about.
Wed Mar 02 16:17:19 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> i didn'taskl anything of anyone. i listen to a large cross-section of the bitcoin relay network.
Wed Mar 02 16:16:46 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> well, ~nobody.