Matches for from:mircea_popescu, 253931 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Fri Mar 18 14:28:24 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> solrodar i am not entertaining your concepts of "non-urgent", and so i won't be showing anything about them.
Fri Mar 18 14:27:35 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> but ftr it's slowly dawning on me just how god damned ~HARD~ it is to speak in the forum. all sorts of separations, between descriptive and prescriptive, between time ; between causes and effects, between roles and hierarchies... jesus god how does anyone even keep it straight.
Fri Mar 18 14:26:40 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> "if you didn't need to pay him as a supplier, fuck him". how's the receiver to justify this "downgrade" ?
Fri Mar 18 14:19:45 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> and if i'm reading this correctly there may well be death sentences ?
Fri Mar 18 14:17:51 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> and 2. IF you want to argue against something i said, do yourself the favour and BRING VERY GOOD ARGUMENTS. because your own personal word will count for nothing much, and you'll just make a clown out of yourself.
Fri Mar 18 14:17:14 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this flows from the definition of the term supplier (comes before the company on the flow) and customer (comes after).
Fri Mar 18 14:16:57 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> two things, read them outloud to yourself. 1. if A is a class senior to B, then receiver MAY NOT proceed to pay B until he has disposed of A entirely. therefore suppliers MUST be in A and cusomters in B, BECAUSE customers can do nothing to injure the bankrupt concern,. whereas the suppliers can.
Fri Mar 18 14:16:02 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> pfff.
Fri Mar 18 14:15:57 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> !down solrodar
Fri Mar 18 14:15:54 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> motherfucker.
Fri Mar 18 14:15:20 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> do you read what's being said ?
Fri Mar 18 14:13:40 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> of gold plated solid arguments.
Fri Mar 18 14:13:30 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> you wanna argue against something i said, do yourself and especially your posterity the favour of coming with eighteen armored divisions.
Fri Mar 18 14:13:12 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> and in general this inept "mp said something ; i said something else because i'm just as much a X as mp" is the font of ineptitude.
Fri Mar 18 14:12:42 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this neatly matches the ability of suppliers to cut the spaghetti NOW as opposed to the customers' ability to basically whine moar.
Fri Mar 18 14:12:19 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> seniority is principally important so as to give the receiver the option, not the obligation, to pay things NOW, rather than promise to pay after he pays someone else.
Fri Mar 18 14:11:36 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> solrodar the receiver has the option to set aside bills anyway, so that's not much of a practical consideration.
Fri Mar 18 14:10:32 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> wow check out the darkcoin thing
Fri Mar 18 14:07:37 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> if you ask "there's a general principle in liquidation" you are necessarily asking about fiat practice, there not being another practice in the field.
Fri Mar 18 14:04:16 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> fiat practice is indeed vast and in time it has grown fragmented and oft contradictory.