home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for from:mjr, 5343 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Mon Jul 22 15:15:46 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   physical security is usually a lot easier to maintain

Mon Jul 22 15:15:36 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   my point was, if you have file level...the rest is mostly irrelevant, and that attack vector is IMO the smallest

Mon Jul 22 15:14:55 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   yes, i know, you would want to get disk level and then partition level and maybe even file level

Mon Jul 22 15:14:32 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   yo dawg, i heard you like encryption...

Mon Jul 22 15:13:52 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   so they would be encrypted either way

Mon Jul 22 15:13:44 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   you can have disk level, but you would still encrypt the files that are important

Mon Jul 22 15:13:30 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   well that is what i mean

Mon Jul 22 15:13:20 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   using a network

Mon Jul 22 15:13:16 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   almost all were by someone gaining access to a machine that was already on

Mon Jul 22 15:13:03 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   almost none were by someone stealing a hard drive

Mon Jul 22 15:12:55 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   i would say that out of most bitcoin hacks

Mon Jul 22 15:12:46 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   really?

Mon Jul 22 15:12:40 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   which is by far the least of most people's worries

Mon Jul 22 15:12:26 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   if i remember correctly, drive level will only help you in the event someone gains physical access to your machine

Mon Jul 22 15:11:46 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   i mean, drive level encryption really barely helps you

Mon Jul 22 15:11:38 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   can't see how it would make a difference

Mon Jul 22 15:10:55 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   limited writes?

Mon Jul 22 15:10:38 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   i personally like RAID-10's with 2 tb drives

Mon Jul 22 15:10:24 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   where you can partition

Mon Jul 22 15:10:21 UTC 2013  <mjr_>   makes a lot of sense for linux

« Previous Page    Next Page »