Matches for gabriel_laddel, 3496 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Wed Sep 09 05:54:22 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> SBCL is 400k
Wed Sep 09 05:54:16 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> vs. SBCL?
Wed Sep 09 05:54:13 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> how many LoC is nano?
Wed Sep 09 05:53:28 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> mircea_popescu: well by that token, the same stands for nano
Wed Sep 09 05:53:02 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> gabriel_laddel re "bind *real-eval* to nil" meh. this works in the same sense "provable code" works. in academia.
Wed Sep 09 05:50:46 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> just do it
Wed Sep 09 05:50:45 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> it isnt' a big deal
Wed Sep 09 05:50:41 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> I fucking write "apps" for it now, for money.
Wed Sep 09 05:50:38 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> gabriel_laddel: The difference between what you do now and what Mike Hearn does is 2013 and 2015. Mike Hearn knew his mission was to destroy through evangalism. You may no that, you may not but that is still your net effect.
Wed Sep 09 05:49:36 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> BingoBoingo: I do?
Wed Sep 09 05:49:24 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> <gabriel_laddel> mircea_popescu: the people who authored CL thought of your use case. << AND yet you Hearnia around the details
Wed Sep 09 05:49:03 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> mircea_popescu: the people who authored CL thought of your use case.
Wed Sep 09 05:48:58 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> <gabriel_laddel> mircea_popescu: you're still missing the whole "bind *real-eval* to nil" part of the discussion << FUCK YOU IMMA DRAGON
Wed Sep 09 05:48:44 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> mircea_popescu: you're still missing the whole "bind *real-eval* to nil" part of the discussion
Wed Sep 09 05:47:52 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 09-09-2015 04:51:28; punkman: gabriel_laddel: I get your point but also, this kinda sounds to me like "don't use math symbols, write it all with the full power of english"
Wed Sep 09 05:47:44 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> that browser (to me) means strictly JS+CSS+HTML
Wed Sep 09 05:47:20 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> trinque: the whole lispm is a "browser" if you go that direction with words.
Wed Sep 09 05:47:16 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> <gabriel_laddel> trinque: well these are all very good questions, but that's application development. << NO, this is developing separate universes
Wed Sep 09 05:46:46 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> <gabriel_laddel> trinque: I don't see how this is a problem? << I am a librarian, a collector. I want to collect information without collecting a bunch of executable rat turds
Wed Sep 09 05:46:33 UTC 2015 <gabriel_laddel> trinque: well these are all very good questions, but that's application development.