Matches for gossipd, 289 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sun Nov 29 16:36:21 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> pull-only gossipd ftw.
Sun Nov 29 16:35:12 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> gossipd must work on a pull model. exactly like old ml.
Sun Nov 29 16:35:02 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> there is absolutely no reason for gossipd to work on a push model of data transfer.
Sun Nov 29 16:34:47 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> also, thinking about it, it occurs to me that the model we've been using to think about gossipd is fundamentally broken.
Sat Nov 28 21:50:37 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 28-11-2015 20:42:43; phf: ben_vulpes: sure, so you're going to cap the size of ciphertext of what you expect to be nonce, which is fine, but after that you rely on state outside of gossipd (tcp packet from ip such and such) to drop all subsequent
Sat Nov 28 21:48:32 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=28-11-2015#1333229 << for gossipd, using stock gpg, much less an abomination (time the invocations some time..!) like gpgme, is a monumentally bad idea
Sat Nov 28 20:59:27 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> jurov: phf's point though is that then you're relying on state /outside/ of gossipd to run gossipd. if i understand correctly.
Sat Nov 28 20:42:43 UTC 2015 <phf> ben_vulpes: sure, so you're going to cap the size of ciphertext of what you expect to be nonce, which is fine, but after that you rely on state outside of gossipd (tcp packet from ip such and such) to drop all subsequent
Sat Nov 28 17:01:39 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> ascii_field your gossipd node is stuck doing a version of this.
Sat Nov 28 16:49:24 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> but so far we don't even know if we actually want rsa (this for lack of gossipd) nor have we studied shoup etc.
Sat Nov 28 16:46:35 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> mircea_popescu: the 'encrypted connection' item necessarily reduces to gossipd
Sat Nov 28 06:20:37 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> gossipd.
Mon Nov 23 21:29:52 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> phf: it only makes sense to do gossipd in cl if you reimplement the crypto
Wed Nov 18 14:06:31 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> the answer is gossipd. or, in the short term, an 'octopus' topology with server(s) behind ciphered lines connected to a constellation of private exit proxies, similar to (iirc) what was used in mpex.
Thu Nov 12 19:35:16 UTC 2015 <trinque> adlai: assuming a gossipd wotnet, and there being some way to retrieve things provided by your wot in a cryptographically sound manner, the logs would always be enough
Mon Nov 09 05:18:51 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> so gossipd is practically going to be lisp hand-compiled ot c ?
Mon Nov 09 04:40:15 UTC 2015 <phf> i have some code for gossipd, i'm going to by the spec that's published on trilema, rather then follow up conversation about udp and first packet validation. i wrote enough in c to be able to prime gpg machinery and send packets over the wire (which basically coveres things that i wasn't sure how to do before i started), then i switched to common lisp to get a prototype up. what came out of that so far is updated bindings for lisp
Sun Nov 08 04:03:06 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> (yet the umpteenth reason why gossipd is a weapon of the apocalypse)
Sun Nov 08 03:56:14 UTC 2015 <trinque> yep, I think asciilifeform has it, that it'd be something to build around gossipd
Wed Nov 04 21:01:06 UTC 2015 <asciilifeform> ben_vulpes: how do you do encrypted connections without gossipd ?