Matches for hard fork, 227 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sun Aug 16 15:46:05 UTC 2015 <BingoBoingo> For the record, at LTB we will be switching all our nodes over to BitcoinXT to ensure we stay on the proper chain when the fork is triggered early next year." >> lol https://letstalkbitcoin.com/forum/post/upcoming-bitcoin-hard-fork-r-bitcoin-censorship
Thu Jul 30 02:43:28 UTC 2015 <mod6> so i guess there is still a bit of a fork in the road; even if we do all of the hard work of ensuring peoples host dependantcies are installed before any compiling is even attempted, do we even want that to be a thing, as stan said, this is now obsolete. And do we now maintain a lot of other things for buildroot?
Thu Jul 09 12:53:16 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3cnobx/regarding_raising_the_1mb_block_size_limit_just/ << for those interested in some more "hard fork lulz"
Sat Jul 04 04:20:47 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> hard fork is enlarging the rules.
Fri Jun 19 08:13:58 UTC 2015 <mats> i have been considering the possibility of .cn backing the hard fork
Thu Jun 18 17:43:35 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 18-06-2015 16:30:55; mircea_popescu: a hard fork is this enchanted moment when you borrow the heavenly forge and ... well... rewrite the rules.
Thu Jun 18 17:40:05 UTC 2015 <ascii_field> in fact, even if nothing is visibly changed, a sane rewrite is in fact arguably a hard fork
Thu Jun 18 17:33:50 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 18-06-2015 16:21:50; mircea_popescu: but for the record, no hard fork proposal can be seriously considered that fails to include a fix for such scatteromobilia throughout the codebase.
Thu Jun 18 16:30:55 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> a hard fork is this enchanted moment when you borrow the heavenly forge and ... well... rewrite the rules.
Thu Jun 18 16:21:50 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> but for the record, no hard fork proposal can be seriously considered that fails to include a fix for such scatteromobilia throughout the codebase.
Thu Jun 18 07:12:29 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> and the unix timestamp thing is a good example of when to hard fork
Tue Jun 16 14:00:17 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> the original mike hearn induced hard fork.
Fri Jun 12 15:24:46 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> so garzik proposes a soft-fork, and the shills act more retarded than ever stating, "No. We need to hard fork the network and up the cap."
Wed Jun 10 21:28:26 UTC 2015 <assbot> ThePiachu's Bitcoin Blog: Handling bitcoins during a hard fork - pondering Bitcoin XT ... ( http://bit.ly/1dxukgh )
Mon Jun 08 02:02:49 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> do you still think a hard fork is "acceptable for expediency's sake" ?
Sun May 31 16:00:10 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> wake up this morning and all I see in my BTC feed is derps talkinga bout hard-fork?!?
Wed May 27 14:36:44 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> asciilifeform: seems like "clustefuck to the hard fork" type deal goin on.
Sat May 16 00:48:07 UTC 2015 <copypaste> Yep, haven't heard of him in a while. When his buddy Andressen tried to be relevant again everyone just laughed at him until he gave on his hard fork idea.
Fri May 08 14:41:06 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> "I don?t really have a strong opinion on block size either?but if we?re going to do a hard fork, let?s use this as an opportunity to create a good process for hard forks (which we?ll inevitably need to do again in the future)." << leave it up to these guys and the 21 million cap will be lifted in a matter of years
Mon May 04 01:37:42 UTC 2015 <assbot> Hard fork: allow 20MB blocks after 1 March 2016 · gavinandresen/bitcoin-git@5f46da2 · GitHub ... ( http://bit.ly/1zGB99z )