Matches for hard fork, 227 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sat Jan 31 00:56:42 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> http://qntra.net/2015/01/the-hard-fork-missile-crisis/ 328 0.3 % 328 2.3 %
Fri Jan 30 00:44:40 UTC 2015 <felipelalli> to "confiscated" the gold (I heard about that but I have to study more deeply). I came to this conclusion because I know bitcoin can't be available 24/7 forever. It will eventually fail in some situation (for example during a bad made hard fork - either because Gavin's gang spoiled or not) and at that time everybody should already is using some strong second coin to be used as backup during a temporary "bitcoin blackout". I think this coin
Thu Jan 22 03:49:26 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 21-01-2015 18:11:39; gavinandresen: a hard fork means everybody running a full node must upgrade, or they will be on a different chain
Thu Jan 22 01:38:07 UTC 2015 <CoraCrisT> so Kim Kardashian is publishing her new book/photo album called Selfie or Selfish... Amazon is selling a book with Satoshi`s posts from bitcointalk and gavin wants to hard fork bitcoin...
Wed Jan 21 18:13:41 UTC 2015 <felipelalli> increase the 21M max coins is possible through a hard fork?
Wed Jan 21 18:12:28 UTC 2015 <gavinandresen> ben_vulpes: yes; a soft fork makes the protocol more strict. You have to hard fork to make it more lenient.
Wed Jan 21 18:11:50 UTC 2015 <davout> ben_vulpes: a soft fork is making the set of valid blocks smaller, a hard fork is the opposite
Wed Jan 21 18:11:39 UTC 2015 <gavinandresen> a hard fork means everybody running a full node must upgrade, or they will be on a different chain
Wed Jan 21 18:09:49 UTC 2015 <gavinandresen> … that was a soft fork, not a hard fork, but it still caused people to accuse me of trying to destroy Bitcoin
Wed Jan 21 17:09:04 UTC 2015 <mike_c> which isn't really true. and the fact of that will become interesting when mpex takes a side on the hard-fork.
Wed Jan 21 04:23:29 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> reddit : "You're only looking at the technical side of it. Leaving the 1 MB block size issue for later is risky due to political/social reasons. Every hard fork brings with it uncertainty and risks because it requires wide consensus to be carried out smoothly. As long as these risks hang over the Bitcoin economy, many companies will be hesitant to make long-term commitments to the Bitcoin economy. Afterall, a hard fork
Wed Jan 21 04:23:29 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> could lead to Bitcoin community splitting into two networks, or a hard fork could end up not happening due to community infighting. Both of these would be disastrous for the Bitcoin economy.
Wed Jan 21 04:23:29 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> The 1 MB block size limit needs to removed as soon as possible, and replaced with something that scales automatically, rather than through risky hard forks that require political consensus. It's 2015, Microsoft, one of the largest companies in the world, accepts Bitcoin, and the Bitcoin network can only handle 3 transactions per second, unless there is a hard fork. Getting rid of the 1 MB block size limit is long overd
Sat Jan 17 03:12:19 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> what with all the hard fork drama, i'd say anything that can be kept centralized should probably remain centralized
Wed Jan 14 01:34:47 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> i kinda want him to release statement "I'm going ahead with hard fork"
Wed Jan 14 01:23:42 UTC 2015 <mike_c> and this is before the hard fork.
Tue Jan 13 20:47:05 UTC 2015 <assbot> The Hard Fork Missile Crisis | Qntra.net ... ( http://bit.ly/1IHLBw3 )
Tue Jan 13 20:47:04 UTC 2015 <cazalla> 50/50 on publishing trollish comments but then where do you draw the line? http://qntra.net/2015/01/the-hard-fork-missile-crisis/#comment-7168
Tue Jan 13 16:09:52 UTC 2015 <assbot> The Hard Fork Missile Crisis : Bitcoin ... ( http://bit.ly/1wb1y6X )
Tue Jan 13 16:09:51 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> cazalla: so someone is fucking with that hard fork missle crisis reddit link.. 1 comment, 3 upvotes? <<< http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/duplicates/2s2utx/the_hard_fork_missile_crisis/ << seems reddit deleted the 500 votes / 300 comments thing in what's a doomed attempt to frame the issue as marginal.