Matches for hard fork, 227 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Jan 13 10:36:13 UTC 2015 <assbot> The Hard Fork Missile Crisis : Bitcoin ... ( http://bit.ly/1CcT8Rs )
Tue Jan 13 10:36:12 UTC 2015 <cazalla> so someone is fucking with that hard fork missle crisis reddit link.. 1 comment, 3 upvotes? http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2s2utx/the_hard_fork_missile_crisis/
Mon Jan 12 23:32:22 UTC 2015 <assbot> kixunil comments on The Hard Fork Missile Crisis ... ( http://bit.ly/1A9g9lI )
Mon Jan 12 19:08:30 UTC 2015 <assbot> Bitcoin doesn’t need a hard fork, it needs hard people. | Contravex: A blog by Pete Dushenski ... ( http://bit.ly/1BUMocE )
Mon Jan 12 08:57:24 UTC 2015 <assbot> Hard fork block size politics: do we want decentralized digital gold, or just another Visa? : Bitcoin ... ( http://bit.ly/1DON8PY )
Mon Jan 12 00:16:44 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> "This is one of the shittiest pieces of fear mongering I've ever read. Hard forking is and should be a natural and regular occurance and never has any hard fork ever threatened the block chain. It's called natural selection. Have a little faith in the educated masses"
Sun Jan 11 23:50:07 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> <sgornick> First, gotta get some vocabulary simplified. When we had the unplanned hard-fork March 2013, we had the protocol "pre-v0.8' and "v0.8" . What do we call this protocol with the hard fork implemented vs. that without the hard fork (i.e., unchanged? ) << bitcoin vs gavincoin.
Sun Jan 11 23:42:17 UTC 2015 <davout> sgornick: it was a hard fork in the sense that not all implementations behaved the same way, not in the sense that a rule was changed
Sun Jan 11 23:40:17 UTC 2015 <davout> sgornick: it wasn't a hard fork in the sense that no rule was changed
Sun Jan 11 23:39:38 UTC 2015 <sgornick> First, gotta get some vocabulary simplified. When we had the unplanned hard-fork March 2013, we had the protocol "pre-v0.8' and "v0.8" . What do we call this protocol with the hard fork implemented vs. that without the hard fork (i.e., unchanged? )
Sun Jan 11 23:34:11 UTC 2015 <sgornick> Why? 100% of those will be rejected on the side of the fork from nodes without the hard-fork implemented.
Sun Jan 11 22:36:33 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> <davout> would transactions still propagated accross fork branches in the event of a hard fork scenario? <>< hard to tell, but mostly yes.
Sun Jan 11 22:31:48 UTC 2015 <davout> would transactions still propagated accross fork branches in the event of a hard fork scenario?
Sun Jan 11 22:00:18 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> a hard fork that's not been ok'd by the bitcoin foundation (the real one, not vessenes' scam) is automatically an issue fort the obvious reason :
Sun Jan 11 21:59:55 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> gavin does NOT have the authority to create a hard fork.
Sun Jan 11 21:59:45 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> "I agree a big discussion is necessary before changes are made, but we shouldn't act like a hard fork is somehow inherently an issue."
Sun Jan 11 21:57:58 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> there never was a hard fork before. the march event was an observed fork which was resolved by abandoning the new chain.
Sun Jan 11 20:58:23 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2s2utx/the_hard_fork_missile_crisis/cnlqcd1 << dunno if semantics or what?