Matches for hard fork, 227 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Sun Jan 11 19:24:54 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> danielpbarron "This whole hard fork drama is part of the bigger brain-damaged notion that Bitcoin isn't about money." << you actuyally have an excellent point here.
Sun Jan 11 03:52:24 UTC 2015 <assbot> The Hard Fork Missile Crisis | Qntra.net ... ( http://bit.ly/1w8dGFC )
Sun Jan 11 03:52:23 UTC 2015 <ben_vulpes> thestringpuller: http://qntra.net/2015/01/the-hard-fork-missile-crisis/ << wd
Sun Jan 11 02:54:17 UTC 2015 <assbot> The Hard Fork Missile Crisis | Qntra.net ... ( http://bit.ly/1A4dsld )
Sun Jan 11 02:43:41 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> "I don't think a hard fork would be very difficult, but only if the following two points are taken into account:
Sat Jan 10 21:25:01 UTC 2015 <danielpbarron> if the hard fork happens, it should be possible to cycle funds in and out of exchanges that are dumb enough to switch, splitting away real-bitcoin whenever the withdraw gives you an output that hasn't been doublespent yet -- or is this possibility too good to be true?
Sat Jan 10 00:56:20 UTC 2015 <scoopbot> New post on Qntra.net by thestringpuller: http://qntra.net/2015/01/the-hard-fork-missile-crisis/
Thu Jan 08 22:28:17 UTC 2015 <thestringpuller> This bet resolves no if Gavin's proposed hard fork is launched, and in succession achieves 51% consensus of the network. This bet resolves yes, if the current Bitcoin fork keeps 51% consensus of the network, or if Gavin's proposed hard fork is never launched.
Wed Nov 19 07:20:43 UTC 2014 <dartv> BingoBoingo: so far most people agree which address has how many BTC. i think I mean hard fork
Thu Nov 13 21:47:15 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform: hence, they add up to an act of sabotage. what probably amounts to a hard fork that 'no one' noticed. << i dun think so, fwiw
Thu Nov 13 17:09:45 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> hence, they add up to an act of sabotage. what probably amounts to a hard fork that 'no one' noticed.
Thu Nov 13 01:23:38 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> On it's own it's a naive thing, but the conversation around it will lead to bad things as it will probably lead to hard fork talk to set the stage for the blocksize increase discussion.
Wed Nov 12 20:33:19 UTC 2014 <thestringpuller> i just find it fascinating that the percent of redditards against any hard fork is going up by a lot.
Wed Nov 12 20:26:58 UTC 2014 <thestringpuller> so this is all plan to get away with hard fork in future?
Wed Nov 12 20:25:12 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2i6pz0/peter_todds_checklocktimeverify_means_bitcoin/ckzdetm << reddit isn't fully retarded << basically, they know they won't get away witrh a hard fork, trying to dissolve the "gavin is making a hardfork" issue into a seemingly better "everyone wants a hardfork, gavin's is just the one that emerged from the democratic hardforking process"
Mon Oct 27 00:58:57 UTC 2014 <ben_vulpes> "death of the preivous hard fork" meaning the actions that brought everyone onto the same chain?
Mon Oct 27 00:58:01 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> well, the death of the previous hard fork (the one gavin & hearn created) happened through the cooperation of the meanwhile defunct 50btc guild.
Mon Oct 27 00:57:29 UTC 2014 <ben_vulpes> mircea_popescu: so the pool operators really decide if the hard fork goes off, correct?
Wed Oct 22 21:40:29 UTC 2014 <mike_c> also requires a "soft-fork" of bitcoin, but don't worry, that's not as bad as a hard fork.