home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for hard fork, 227 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Wed Oct 22 02:43:18 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   asciilifeform: which'd be the earliest that would interoperate with the majority of extant nodes? << last hard fork was to .4, so technically anything. but i'd say a .6 something'd be the best choice.

Wed Oct 22 02:19:07 UTC 2014  <mod6>   i can't believe that pinwheel said he was still gonna hard-fork in the AMA (thx for readers digest qntra) even after this: http://trilema.com/2014/usgavin-the-lolcow/ | I suspect that he reads trilema too. lollerskates.

Tue Oct 21 16:32:50 UTC 2014  <diametric>   maybe i'm mistaken but doesn't the white paper basically state a hard fork will be required in the future to address scalability?

Tue Oct 21 01:11:07 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   this was the mechanism of the previous hard fork : .8 miners included tx rejected by the network, moved on a different chain.

Tue Oct 21 01:09:57 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   <ben_vulpes> if 0.9 says "this txn sucks!" but an 0.6 miner included it, this takes us right to a hard fork << yep

Tue Oct 21 00:55:58 UTC 2014  <ben_vulpes>   if 0.9 says "this txn sucks!" but an 0.6 miner included it, this takes us right to a hard fork

Thu Oct 16 17:00:55 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   thickasthieves the hard fork is a problem, mostly because they're trying to introduce a whole slew of 0days into the protocol itself.

Fri Oct 10 05:31:42 UTC 2014  <asciilifeform>   not actually hard if you've discovered electromagnetism (electric tuning fork clock, considerably simpler than harrison's chronometer, is quite easy to construct)

Wed Oct 08 23:45:30 UTC 2014  <assbot>   Logged on 08-10-2014 23:36:46; thestringpuller: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2im4zv/gavin_andresen_proposes_bitcoin_hard_fork_to/cl3pga6

Wed Oct 08 23:36:46 UTC 2014  <thestringpuller>   http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2im4zv/gavin_andresen_proposes_bitcoin_hard_fork_to/cl3pga6

Wed Oct 08 23:36:46 UTC 2014  <assbot>   justusranvier comments on Gavin Andresen Proposes Bitcoin Hard Fork to Address Network Scalability

Wed Oct 08 14:15:03 UTC 2014  <nubbins`>   !s hard fork

Wed Oct 08 14:15:03 UTC 2014  <assbot>   17 results for 'hard fork' : http://search.bitcoin-assets.com/?q=hard+fork

Mon Jul 28 20:50:40 UTC 2014  <cr_zoidberg>   mircea_popescu: not really bug - it was bad design i guess. to fix it they need to make core changes and make hard fork. we have just different transaction format.

Thu Jul 17 14:21:50 UTC 2014  <assbot>   8 Million Vericoin Hack Prompts Hard Fork to Recover Funds

Sun Jul 13 04:23:39 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   apparently they got a hard fork.

Wed Jul 02 16:08:56 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   GinAddict1 mike is the chief enemy plant in bitcoin. he's the guy that merged heartbleed in bitcoin for absolutely no legitimatereason, and he's the guy that forced a hard fork, idem.

Fri Jun 20 17:21:36 UTC 2014  <ThickAsThieves>   "Update your client, HARD FORK! Friday we will begin paying MasterNodes - Latest Client Stable: 9.10.1 and RC3 with Darksend is 10.10.1 - See downloads!" ~ Darkcoin developer

Sun Jun 15 09:19:12 UTC 2014  <benkay>   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=309073.msg3315672#msg3315672 // but how are you going to get the pools to support a hard fork that would allow their participants to cheat?

Fri Jun 13 13:33:09 UTC 2014  <mircea_popescu>   last time that happened we ended up with a hard fork. so far ghash is 0-1 on the score.

« Previous Page    Next Page »