home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for havelock -from:assbot, 997 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

22-11-2017 10:04:31  <punkman>   so 1btcxe is pretty much havelock's exchange?

22-11-2017 09:52:25  <pankkake>   it looks like a thing that raised funds on havelock

30-03-2016 18:44:42  <jurov>   kakobrekla: but #bitcoin-assets-trades now shows only havelock?

29-11-2015 23:09:13  <adlai>   does havelock have any wot presence?

05-11-2015 12:42:41  <punkman>   dat havelock action

05-11-2015 00:25:16  <jurov>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=04-11-2015#1316307 it was drafted and submitted to mpex and havelock, that did not work out, so we just coasted on.

18-09-2015 04:20:56  <BingoBoingo>   Oh lo Havelol [HAVELOCK] [7C] 148 @ 0.00046664 = 0.0691 BTC [-] {2}

13-09-2015 22:04:18  <mircea_popescu>   from 20:38:44 to 23:01:58, : [BTCTC] 328 lines ; [HAVELOCK] 11 lines ; [MPEX] absent.

11-09-2015 01:16:26  <BingoBoingo>   Havelol >> <assbot> [HAVELOCK] [B.MINE] 1 @ 0.0985 BTC [+]

03-09-2015 16:17:53  <thestringpuller>   havelock still exists?

12-06-2015 01:35:13  <BingoBoingo>   <assbot> [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 8 @ 0.0052001 = 0.0416 BTC [-] << Incredilol

10-06-2015 14:14:24  <asciilifeform>   i dare to say these are more interesting than what happened every minute on 'havelock'

01-06-2015 20:30:38  <williamdunne>   Maybe they can do more crowdfunding with the latest Havelock IPO?

27-05-2015 00:57:18  <BingoBoingo>   Big trades seem fine. Not all that common. Tis information. Small trades though... like <assbot> [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 55 @ 0.00005229 = 0.0029 BTC [-]

25-05-2015 15:16:45  <punkman>   so what happened to havelock?

16-04-2015 04:23:19  <pete_dushenski>   i saw several other articles, zipfuckingzero mentioning havelock investors

30-03-2015 00:22:49  <jurov>   kakobrekla/lampelina btw, you can remove havelock from bitcoin-assets.com ?

05-03-2015 22:00:58  <mike_c>   same reason as havelock. buy a few shares and you feel a part of something big.

05-03-2015 17:14:57  <thestringpuller>   mircea_popescu: o.O havelock returns ? << we are dealing with undead. it is to be expected...

05-03-2015 10:49:56  <mircea_popescu>   o.O havelock returns ?

  Next Page »