Matches for havelock -from:assbot, 1001 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Thu Jun 26 18:15:51 UTC 2014 <pankkake> http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinStocks/comments/29313f/why_do_you_invest/ for more lulz. I mean, there's a clear objective demonstration that investing on havelock is a pretty sure loss, and they… ignore it
Thu Jun 26 11:51:27 UTC 2014 <pankkake> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=665403.0 no one even mentions the only profitable investment on Havelock
Thu Jun 19 19:14:12 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> <+asciilifeform> 'Avarus, Inc. (?we?, ?us?, ?our?) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 20, 2010. The Company was originally organized as a ?blank check? shell Company to investigate and acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation.' << lol! /// The Havelock System
Tue Jun 17 14:23:51 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> "During years of engineering time, we have built a network of partners, resources and contacts in Asia, Europe and the USA." yet the best they could do was still havelock.
Tue Jun 17 01:34:44 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> because now they are actually going against sanity, much like the "havelock users" that somehow "bought" the re-ipo, briefly at 200% averages
Thu Jun 12 02:28:17 UTC 2014 <Blazedout419> omg so who is going to buy into sha on havelock?
Wed Jun 11 16:34:14 UTC 2014 <thestringpuller> havelock is becoming the spam of IPOs
Mon Jun 09 18:49:20 UTC 2014 <Namworld> Hmm, another Havelock IPO...
Mon Jun 09 16:27:39 UTC 2014 <pankkake> assbot: [HAVELOCK] [PROV] 56 @ 0.002 = 0.112 BTC {3} ? this tells everything. 3 transactions for 0.1 BTC
Mon Jun 09 07:32:19 UTC 2014 <fluffypony> "havelock should hv done their checks on him and not offer scam companies."
Sat Jun 07 17:29:59 UTC 2014 <Namworld> That's why I say there hasn't been as much good arbitrage opportunity. Havelock ain't much good.
Thu Jun 05 15:08:56 UTC 2014 <ThickAsThieves> Havelock has similar fees
Tue Jun 03 15:28:50 UTC 2014 <mike_c> artifexd: so where does that leave the shares. owning a share of s.mg on havelock is only worth 50% as much as a share on mpex. crazy, huh. they are way overpricing those havelock shares :)
Tue Jun 03 15:25:10 UTC 2014 <mike_c> but transferring shares off havelock is prohibitively expensive, which is probably why nobody bothers.
Tue Jun 03 15:24:41 UTC 2014 <mike_c> well, i don't need anything. just saying there is arbitrage available between havelock smg passthrough and mpex.
Mon Jun 02 15:42:09 UTC 2014 <pankkake> had to remember I ignore havelock trades
Sat May 31 07:08:45 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> benkay: You see there is a substantial difference between AM1 and RENT. AM1 went as high as 6 BTC (not the havelock asset but the underlying) and served as the TardStar for 18 months now. It is now flirting with equity under IPO price. RENT was always questionable in price.
Fri May 30 15:57:53 UTC 2014 <jurov> and Havelock did incredible obstructions and derpage around it
Thu May 29 15:37:42 UTC 2014 <Mats_cd03> havelock sucks why does it matter
Thu May 29 15:37:37 UTC 2014 <bitcoinpete> mike_c: are trades on havelock different than bets now?