Matches for heysteve, 1639 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Thu Dec 10 17:39:57 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> you've made your point but that's going too far
Thu Dec 10 17:39:17 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> mircea_popescu, do you really want Pieter Wuille's blood on your hands?
Fri Oct 23 19:04:21 UTC 2015 <assbot> Logged on 23-10-2015 16:11:41; HeySteve: well, I've accepted a freelance writing contract for this weekend so I can't make any immediate changes. if someone is interested in editing it, I think it's worth doing before Banx assumes its next form
Fri Oct 23 16:11:41 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> well, I've accepted a freelance writing contract for this weekend so I can't make any immediate changes. if someone is interested in editing it, I think it's worth doing before Banx assumes its next form
Fri Oct 23 16:06:22 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> it was originally titled: BanxShares: BitAsset or BitLiability?
Fri Oct 23 16:04:40 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> yes 36, not that I'm an expert in spotting scams but it seems clear this is a company to be avoided
Fri Oct 23 16:03:42 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> no I didn't make up a number, I covered all the data and tallied the red flags as I went
Fri Oct 23 16:02:33 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> 3. the hardforks with another one coming as soon as this weekend
Fri Oct 23 16:02:00 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> 2. the business plan which drew in investors has been changed
Fri Oct 23 16:01:39 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> well ok, 1. the ICO was sustained for a year+ because it didn't raise the projected revenue
Fri Oct 23 16:00:10 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> red*
Fri Oct 23 16:00:05 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> 36 ref flags showing that it's a scam (not sure if those are in the version you saw)
Fri Oct 23 15:59:37 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> now that time is wasted because arbitrary stylistic reasons which I was never informed of
Fri Oct 23 15:59:02 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> mircea_popescu, the problem is I spent 5 fucking days researching BANX and interviewing Lyford so that fewer suckers would be scammed
Fri Oct 23 15:50:08 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> so perhaps too many words and perhaps overly kind to BTS, although I do believe their technology is good.
Fri Oct 23 15:49:32 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> mircea_popescu, "no revenue model" is an easy change. the goal was to systematically dispell the smoke and mirrors around BANX and influence BTS to avoid it.
Fri Oct 23 15:38:15 UTC 2015 <mircea_popescu> <HeySteve> as for the rest, mircea_popescu, you may dismiss everything that isn't Bitcoin 0.5 as a scam but I do not take this view without evidence << but note that none of that is in any sense what i said.
Fri Oct 23 14:42:25 UTC 2015 <funkenstein_> HeySteve, I think the claim is not that newer codes are scam, but that they add little of value compared to their weight in cruft
Fri Oct 23 14:24:36 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> as for the rest, mircea_popescu, you may dismiss everything that isn't Bitcoin 0.5 as a scam but I do not take this view without evidence
Fri Oct 23 13:57:47 UTC 2015 <HeySteve> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=22-10-2015#1305601 < out of BanxCapital's operations, imaginary or otherwise, which I listed in detail