Matches for i, 164546 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 13 22:29:31 UTC 2017 <asciilifeform> now you know that i am running a proggy (say, ssh) with known remote-execution 0day (say, stack overflow)
Mon Mar 13 22:29:05 UTC 2017 <asciilifeform> say i have a cpu where the instruction set is randomly-generated on boot. (it is quite possible to make this, on fpga.)
Mon Mar 13 22:28:36 UTC 2017 <adlai> btw i have not yet found the 'miners in every cpu made since 2010' thread, still looking
Mon Mar 13 22:21:59 UTC 2017 <adlai> what depresses me worst is the futility of trb-i-ing (or even trb-ing!) on today's hardware
Mon Mar 13 22:17:45 UTC 2017 <adlai> at some point, if trb-i should become more geld and less denken, one must draw the line at conspiracy absurdity
Mon Mar 13 22:11:38 UTC 2017 <adlai> anyway - i do think the chances of a hostile fork are low
Mon Mar 13 22:08:36 UTC 2017 <adlai> b) i have a general sense of that discussion. no, i can't recite it from memory, but if there's a ~specific~ point you want to make, please at least make clearer what it is (don't have to spell it out, just make it findable - "in 2013" is a big search space)
Mon Mar 13 22:06:04 UTC 2017 <adlai> if you were to continue making ad-hominem attacks rather than giving a link to a specific point in the logs, i might have to find a more polite way of asking you to be more polite yourself
Mon Mar 13 22:04:25 UTC 2017 <asciilifeform> adlai: if you were to read the logs, you would find that i described this scenario in agonizing detail in 2013.
Mon Mar 13 22:00:57 UTC 2017 <asciilifeform> maybe it is all customized specifically for bruteforcing rsa, i have nfi.
Mon Mar 13 22:00:41 UTC 2017 <asciilifeform> why not -- i do not know
Mon Mar 13 22:00:20 UTC 2017 <asciilifeform> adlai: the 'warehouse of hardware' thing was a scenario i described in 2013, when first found #bitcoin-assets . for some reason it has not materialized.
Mon Mar 13 21:58:01 UTC 2017 <asciilifeform> adlai: you can go and re-read the 'missile crisis' article yourself, i will not summarize it again for the nth time.
Mon Mar 13 21:57:07 UTC 2017 <Framedragger> fair point, though i laughed at the "either you're with trb *or* you're with nsa"
Mon Mar 13 21:53:20 UTC 2017 <adlai> i agree re: throwing out the liquishit. i do think that ye olde protocolle is long gone, even trb is patched to reflect this. i'm not sure what you mean by "trb goes kaput", although i do agree that the chance is low that it would be worth more dollars than the other chain (or to have "more hashpower", however you'd measure that across different functions)
Mon Mar 13 21:42:51 UTC 2017 <adlai> i have a growing impression that miners are, in a sense, luddites. this works in bitcoin's favor (note that i say bitcoin, not trb, or prb), because it means they prefer to keep using the least "improved" code that still functions
Mon Mar 13 21:38:23 UTC 2017 <assbot> Logged on 12-03-2017 15:26:24; asciilifeform: see mp's 'i will pay $700 per trb coin , hell or high water' remark.
Mon Mar 13 21:37:35 UTC 2017 <adlai> you misunderstood me. i mean as a trb patch, INSTEAD of trb-i
Mon Mar 13 21:35:35 UTC 2017 <assbot> Logged on 12-03-2017 15:23:52; Framedragger: if trb won't be adopted by prb'ers, why not make sane trb-i.
Mon Mar 13 21:33:36 UTC 2017 <assbot> Logged on 12-03-2017 15:19:02; asciilifeform: fact is , that thing won't run in my house, and NEVER will, and cannot be fixed so that it will, what am i to call it other than worthless.