Matches for i, 164546 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Apr 19 14:52:49 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> i wonder if he tips his co-beggars without the lamination
Tue Apr 19 14:46:48 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> nfi what that is but i assume you need a phone for that?
Tue Apr 19 14:35:59 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> i encountered my first subway car qr code beggar today
Mon Apr 18 22:45:41 UTC 2016 <ag3nt_zer0> i dont know if you are missing anything... not sure what "not repeating that bs anymo" means... but like I said I just had some and was looking for perspective
Mon Apr 18 22:37:30 UTC 2016 <ag3nt_zer0> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=16-04-2016#1444221 < kakobrekla: no man that definitely is not the case... what I said was true - I won some amps and was just looking for an honest opinion... anyway i sold 3/4 of what I had
Sun Apr 17 13:44:23 UTC 2016 <PeterL> I am just saying that I think davout is making the right decision, and you seem to disagree?
Sun Apr 17 13:26:28 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> i dont feel like repeating myself, maybe you should read the logs, as short as they are.
Sun Apr 17 13:20:11 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> PeterL show me the evidence that the payment did not come from bitbet? I have the evidence that payment was made (which is the total sum that bb is promises)
Sun Apr 17 03:34:29 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=16-04-2016#1444243 << i also have nfi.
Sat Apr 16 23:50:15 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> to rephrase the technicals yet again: you have no evidence that bb did not already pay out those winner addresses and i have the evidence that those winner addresses already received btc which was all that bitbet ever promised
Sat Apr 16 23:24:35 UTC 2016 <kakobrekla> i am also for number two. which means applying remedies where needed.
Sat Apr 16 20:50:39 UTC 2016 <davout> if you do not sign the statement, the consequence is that this expense can not be accounted against bitbet, as per the contract, which is precisely what i am doing
Sat Apr 16 20:47:21 UTC 2016 <davout> kakobrekla: i don't dismiss your concern as being depressing, i dismiss it as being invalid
Sat Apr 16 18:34:47 UTC 2016 <jurov> kakobrekla, i don't understand, mircea did claim that transactions his (or bitbet's), why whould be his signature needed?
Sat Apr 16 14:37:44 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> ah i see it now
Sat Apr 16 14:32:34 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> i got a picture for you, hold on a sec
Sat Apr 16 14:31:16 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> i kinda thought that went without saying
Sat Apr 16 14:30:57 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> asciilifeform, yeah I know right? good lesson in "market cap" here
Sat Apr 16 13:47:30 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> a pity that, i had such high hopes for the republic of no thing is equal to any other thing
Sat Apr 16 13:37:18 UTC 2016 <funkenstein_> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-04-2016#1444005 <-- I tried to research it a bit, but couldn't find much to look at