home | log | search | bash | stats | wiki


Matches for it are a fact, 87 total results Sorted by newest | relevance

Tue Aug 09 21:26:25 UTC 2016  <kakobrekla>   anyway, i am in fact working actively on one bitcoin project and planted a few seeds for second one. why is this not discussed here? first of all, the few people that are still about seem to be coders, poets or philosophers. i do not need poets or philosophers for the thing im doing. as for coding - i most enjoy it when i do it myself.

Thu Apr 28 15:14:30 UTC 2016  <kakobrekla>   http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=28-04-2016#1445706 < he already unmasked himself - this is, lets use the word: 'undisputed'. but like with pirate, unsophisticated folks *want to believe*. there is no way to show flat-earther that earth is in fact round, except for a taking a really long route around it and meticulously avoiding getting stuck in circles. if you think chinese konspiraci is a thing, why are you still here? and if you

Fri Apr 15 01:33:16 UTC 2016  <kakobrekla>   now this is all rather theoretical but nevertheless lets give it a go - as already established bitbet payouts were not unambiguous - this was possibly a flaw in design as at no point there wast any explicit statement published that would be claiming that 'this are _the_ coins owed' - from which it follows that any payment made to a given winning address (made after the bet was made) could in fact be treated as deduction of liability

Fri Apr 01 07:35:15 UTC 2016  <assbot>   Logged on 01-04-2016 07:05:37; punkman: kakobrekla: yes i get it you are all sarcastic and stuff, but the fact remains that questions such as 'what should i believe and why' is a scientific one. << I disagree and believing this applies to everything is what gets you "experts" and "climate change"

Fri Apr 01 07:05:37 UTC 2016  <punkman>   kakobrekla: yes i get it you are all sarcastic and stuff, but the fact remains that questions such as 'what should i believe and why' is a scientific one. << I disagree and believing this applies to everything is what gets you "experts" and "climate change"

Fri Apr 01 06:33:25 UTC 2016  <kakobrekla>   yes i get it you are all sarcastic and stuff, but the fact remains that questions such as 'what should i believe and why' is a scientific one.

Tue Mar 15 20:49:55 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   BingoBoingo incidentally, since you're maybe the only guy here that actually gas re us politics : admitting for the sake of this argument that trump really is the you know, tell-it-how-it-is, fight back against the system independent bla bla : what does the fact that he isn't making "electronic votes are not a sufficient way to settle this election" a central part of his campaign ?

Mon Mar 07 23:03:15 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   a statement of fact is a statement of fact. it only becomes a proof if used in a reasoning. a fact and a proof are very different items : one's a realia, the other ideal.

Tue Feb 23 08:40:36 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   look here : "DeathFromAbove writes to DPR, "It's not that easy [AA]. I'm legit. Green Beret. Friend of [C.G.]. I have access to TS/SCI files that FBI, DEA, AFP, SOCA would kill for. In fact, that is what I do ... kill. The only thing that I do . . . Don't worry DoD has no interest in you and your little website. North Korea and Iran are a lot more important. In fact, as far as the Army and Navy are concerned you are a

Wed Feb 10 20:20:04 UTC 2016  <mircea_popescu>   i originally gave it as an example to stand pro toto for a larger set. specifically - that hunting the p = np thing is a waste of time, when there are in point of fact items known to be harder than np.

Sat Feb 06 17:45:54 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   mircea_popescu did learn a useful fact, if he had not already known it, namely that... there are not yet cryptographers

Tue Jan 12 12:47:57 UTC 2016  <asciilifeform>   i get it, there is a fashion in the derp army of going around and 'i'm a visual thinker!11111'. this changes nothing. there are napoleons in your local loony bin, does not change the historic fact of napoleon.

Mon Jan 04 23:15:09 UTC 2016  <phf>   b-a on the other hand relies on the fact that we control the subtrate, and can defend it sufficiently. the log, blogs and services are hosted on own machines, developed to own requirements to reflect an evolving set of ideas of how this place is supposed to run.

Mon Dec 21 09:54:44 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   on one hand, the "dominion" approach to thinking isn't particularly useful here, because all it does is provide the limiting (the disadvantageous) part of setting boundries, without delivering any kind of protective (ie, advantageous) offset. Specifically how boundries work is, suppose you have two kids, Amy aged 7 and Adam aged 6. If you set a boundry such as "Adam, never hit Amy!" you are in fact limiting Adam's natu

Tue Nov 24 03:30:05 UTC 2015  <assbot>   Logged on 23-11-2015 20:26:41; mircea_popescu: "What often deters writers from going through with the above plan is the fact that, well, Most Writers Are Writers. They're writing a character who's supposed to be a musician, but they don't know the particulars of meters or chords. They have a character who is a military expert, but they don't know how long an infantry division can fight until it needs to be resupplied. They have a character who's

Mon Nov 23 20:26:41 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   "What often deters writers from going through with the above plan is the fact that, well, Most Writers Are Writers. They're writing a character who's supposed to be a musician, but they don't know the particulars of meters or chords. They have a character who is a military expert, but they don't know how long an infantry division can fight until it needs to be resupplied. They have a character who's a genius, but they

Sat Nov 21 23:31:41 UTC 2015  <phf>   just because you can do it, doesn't give it meaning. in fact that sort of attempts at ontology result in a lot of bad code. (not to mention that they are doomed to failure, e.g. semantic web)

Tue Nov 10 04:09:14 UTC 2015  <asciilifeform>   'A number of readers ran straight for the ?conspiracy theory? rabbit hole. ?Conspiracy theory? is strictly a term of abuse invented by the enemies of free speech and used to try to invalidate narratives that are not officially sanctioned by the L?genpresse (the lying press). This term fails to signify anything beyond the fact that those who use it need to be taken out to the woodshed.' << with new, shiny, teutonic fla

Mon Nov 02 19:55:59 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   in other news, "There are, in fact, fairy tales about women with agency, and your article would have been even stronger if you knew them (but it's understandable that you don't). "The Girl Without Hands" for one, and a fairy tale retelling of the Psyche and Eros legend, "East of the Sun and West of the Moon". (The retelling is better than the Greek legend, where Psyche is deus ex machina'd at the end. She does at least

Mon Nov 02 03:50:31 UTC 2015  <mircea_popescu>   "Not even the girls will condescend to it, and if you can't sell fashion goods to the girls, you can't sell the goods." << fun fact, ties are a purchase mostly controlled by women. JUST LIKE HIGH HEELS,

  Next Page »