Matches for javascript, 428 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Mar 18 02:02:15 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> asciilifeform, further, as a practical matter you are not being asked to transmit a real key. You are just transmitting a stupid session key that is used to sign a single document. And if that session key is used in javascript, which is VERY far from the metal (it's a VM, running in interpreter, JS running in a C++ program, firefox, running on Windows) you would have to have insnae precision on learning exact CPU state.
Tue Mar 18 01:32:00 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> Then your browser can scarcely sandbox javascript?
Tue Mar 18 01:31:52 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> Again, it doesn't matter if you reimplement PKI over javascript.
Tue Mar 18 01:30:21 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> I disagree, I think firefox running javascript is one of the simplest things to develop and target 100% of PC's with. Also it would work on some tablets, which have no USB subcomponent at all, but do have copy and paste and wifi connections.
Tue Mar 18 01:24:53 UTC 2014 <asciilifeform> 'browser'? 'javascript'? 'ssl'? no thanks
Tue Mar 18 01:23:58 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> dignork - hmmm.. Well, on Mac and Linux you could do an md5sum or sha1sum on the javascript before you run it. On Windows you can only use a custom certificate, signed by yourself, and know the issuer.
Tue Mar 18 01:22:27 UTC 2014 <dignork> ninjashogun, your javascript is downloaded by firefox, from forgeable location ... p0wned
Tue Mar 18 01:21:51 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> it makes sense to me. You can always assume any computer will have javascript, and a wifi.
Tue Mar 18 01:21:31 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> a javascript pki tunnel
Tue Mar 18 01:21:10 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> dignork, it doesn't matter who firefox trusts. You can run a complete tunnel using javascript all the way to the final end-point. The whole point of PKI is that it doesn't matter who sniffs packets.
Tue Mar 18 01:17:00 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> What changes with Wifi? Well, you can still have a man in the middle, but it would be much more prohibitive. It would need a complete access point that connects to the device masquarading as the computer, while exposing itself to the computer and hiding the true signal from the computer. It's possible, but more difficult. And in the end the computer can do a complete secure session (in javascript with the browser) compl
Fri Mar 14 06:24:30 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> And my best viewership in one day was 34,205 viewers with javascript enabled
Wed Mar 05 20:53:21 UTC 2014 <benkay> ah well, back to javascript hell
Tue Mar 04 23:21:41 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> moiety it can possibly be done in javascript i suppose
Tue Mar 04 23:12:57 UTC 2014 <moiety> mircea_popescu: javascript, html/css (obv) and i will go into php. i'm scared of the contents page of the python book
Sun Mar 02 21:38:01 UTC 2014 <kakobrekla> what should i be using javascript bitcoins?
Sat Mar 01 02:22:01 UTC 2014 <BingoBoingo> mircea_popescu: They used some javascript in the layout it seems. Works ok in the factory firefox install, not in the useful firefox install though
Fri Feb 28 08:26:49 UTC 2014 <mircea_popescu> i am guess javascript issue ?
Tue Feb 25 05:24:01 UTC 2014 <ninjashogun> Here is the other person's profile that he responded with: "I am a full stack web/desktop/mobile developer. Currently my weapon of choice is C# for the back end stuff, and JavaScript for the front end. I am also versed in Objective-C (I have three apps on the app store). Daily my bread and butter is developing web apps. Lately I've been developing cross-platform mobile games. I have a degree in Math, so I know just a bit of graph theory... this
Tue Feb 25 04:48:07 UTC 2014 <greenspan_fan> but gox was able to siphon off 700 000 btc because they had javascript and css basically