Matches for mircea_popescu, 288436 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Tue Mar 15 02:22:11 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> (in the general, not re logs)
Tue Mar 15 02:21:52 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> incidentally, what's the consensus of code wizards, compiled >>> parsed ?
Tue Mar 15 02:21:24 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> ytou'll have to excuse me, i run parsed not compiled logs.
Tue Mar 15 02:21:04 UTC 2016 <phf> mircea_popescu: jurov pointed out the error of my ways, but i believe that i might've accomplished what i was fumbling for already
Tue Mar 15 02:20:50 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-03-2016#1432824 << suppose instead of runnign off to some sort of centralism, you just use the tools available ? they're here for this purpose ; you've seen them at work. gossipd didn't come out of the void, but out of practice based on philosophy honed with practice built on philosophy and so on and again numerous iterations over the years.
Tue Mar 15 02:18:25 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-03-2016#1432816 << it is not mircea_popescu 's call to make.
Tue Mar 15 02:18:25 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 14-03-2016 21:23:52; asciilifeform: i suspect that mircea_popescu would rather burn it than let it go to hitler.
Tue Mar 15 02:17:50 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-03-2016#1432813 << this view i share.
Tue Mar 15 02:15:42 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> (none of this is to say that one ~oughtn't~ try. sure, one ought to try. but also understand that this is exactly like "one ought to try and fuck every woman that can walk within his visual radius". in a veeeheheheheeery theoretical principle, sure. in practice - there is such a thing as penis friction blisters.)
Tue Mar 15 02:12:13 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> one should prolly look through eulora logs for some lulzy examples re the failure of the auction - the free market's revered, holy relic of a chief tool. guess what ? it... doesn't work!
Tue Mar 15 02:10:58 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> and yes - for as long as pick one and you carefully sit under its umbrella, never leaving that domain "it works for me!". except we're in bitcoin specifically to see what's out there.
Tue Mar 15 02:10:22 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> trinque's very basic notion above about "categorically your time" thing is just an axiomatic (if erroneous) pillar supporting one of these methods.
Tue Mar 15 02:09:29 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> so, like it or not, it is still very much a research project for the human race.
Tue Mar 15 02:09:17 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> they get good results in different fields but a) they're alwyas approximations and b) none of them even cover the whole field - not in the sense of being close but in the sense of EVER OFFERING a value function that may take any inputs.
Tue Mar 15 02:08:35 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-03-2016#1432804 << not everything can always be valued. you understand this, yes ? the market, as well as the central planning committee and all sorts of other arrangements (such as - organised religion) exist in an attempt to resolve the "zero-infinity" problem.
Tue Mar 15 02:01:01 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> awell.
Tue Mar 15 02:00:57 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> !s "we were younger then"
Tue Mar 15 02:00:33 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-03-2016#1432795 << in this perspective, that it did last 2012-2016 is quite the fucking divine intervention / pinnacle of human achievement, huh.
Tue Mar 15 01:58:03 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=14-03-2016#1432786 << the very discussion, perhaps.
Tue Mar 15 01:56:43 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> i have nfi, but it was a very bitter thing.