Matches for mircea_popescu, 288436 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 14 18:58:56 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: it is not actually my business how mircea_popescu transmits his tx, but since he chose to present the bbet matter in the tmsr public forum, rather than limiting it to folks 'whose business it is', i will say, that the mpb (client and network both) is a serious ?????? in the story. i have nfi how it works, and imho it actually matters for making sense of the observations.
Mon Mar 14 18:58:10 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> mats the question under audit's not that ; not that it would prevent you from doing whatever.
Mon Mar 14 18:57:23 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 14-03-2016 18:40:42; mircea_popescu: why is that, if the question's not too presumptuous ?
Mon Mar 14 18:57:21 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform if i didn't think so, the qntra piece would have read "fuck vc sybils already".
Mon Mar 14 18:56:37 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> but if mircea_popescu signed a statement that he transmits directly to the miners, and has no doubt that this is so, because he ran the cable himself, i will believe...
Mon Mar 14 18:56:25 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> phf whatever people do with their private funds is their problem, the contract still says the shareholders get it.
Mon Mar 14 18:56:01 UTC 2016 <phf> mircea_popescu: not from what you just said about you and kako paying out of the pocket
Mon Mar 14 18:55:57 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform as a possible explanation.
Mon Mar 14 18:55:46 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: the bbet event suggested that there was at least one layer of prb between mircea_popescu and the miners.
Mon Mar 14 18:55:17 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> phf it wasn't ?!
Mon Mar 14 18:55:01 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform can i relay directly to miners, or can't i ?
Mon Mar 14 18:54:20 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> can i (one) or can't i (one) ?
Mon Mar 14 18:54:10 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> well so which is it.
Mon Mar 14 18:53:00 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> this model of (perceptible relay) + (imperceptible miners) is nonsense of the ilk of meta-nsa-in-the-sky.
Mon Mar 14 18:52:34 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> stat rosa pristina, my dear alf.
Mon Mar 14 18:52:02 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> if not, then in what way ?
Mon Mar 14 18:51:56 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> do they not exactly read "i, asciilifeform, hereby do declare there's no relay network other than the miner's own" ?
Mon Mar 14 18:51:43 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: this is synthesis from earlier threads where you stated that yes, there are sybils, but your octopus of mpb connecting to various trusted folks, incl. over crypted links, is not sybilable
Mon Mar 14 18:50:51 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform did you not say the words "mircea_popescu having a notion that he knows how to avoid connecting through them to the minerz" ?
Mon Mar 14 18:50:11 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> well if mircea_popescu demonstrated the logic whereby miner collusion is a necessary hypothesis, vs sybils alone, i must have slept through it ?