Matches for mircea_popescu, 288436 total results Sorted by newest | relevance
Mon Mar 21 02:20:38 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> nubbins`: i want what mircea_popescu took.
Mon Mar 21 02:19:10 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: global worming.
Mon Mar 21 02:18:50 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> that'd be global warming's fault neh ?
Mon Mar 21 02:18:08 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> i dun have grievances, l0l. well possibly other than the promised snow did not come, i was gonna play go under the blooming sakuras ~in motherfucking snow~ and no go. but afaik mircea_popescu is not responsible for this.
Mon Mar 21 02:17:09 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> is that twerp still begging for attention ?
Mon Mar 21 02:14:13 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> would have helped to write it down. as the original article asked, as the rebuff to the original nubbins` said, and so on. two weeks ago, whatever.
Mon Mar 21 02:13:35 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> there isn't available this "exit by reservation". it's a personal pretense, nothing more.
Mon Mar 21 02:13:17 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> understand how matters of fact work. judge sits down, lets the witness in. witness tells a story. bystanders ask whatever the fuck questions they want. witness answers if he feels like it, and remembers, and has anything to say. at the end of the day, bystanders can as pompously as they wish declare they're not coinvinced. matters not one iota. either better theory is formed, or the thing stands.
Mon Mar 21 02:13:14 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> i mean, mircea_popescu can do whatever he likes with his toys, but let's not pretend that the matter was settled as some kind of actual argument in the phorum
Mon Mar 21 02:12:41 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: this is the 'secret trial with secret evidence' thing again.
Mon Mar 21 02:12:12 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: with argumentum ad dirigible ? yes.
Mon Mar 21 02:11:57 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform and you see a problem with that ?
Mon Mar 21 02:09:02 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: when i asked 'why is miner collusion a necessary hypothesis to explain the bbet reactor melt' i got argumentum ad dirigible.
Mon Mar 21 02:08:36 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> mircea_popescu: everywhere?!
Mon Mar 21 02:08:13 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> asciilifeform everywhere. got published in teh gazette, received exactly no disputation, it's what it is.
Mon Mar 21 01:43:51 UTC 2016 <asciilifeform> http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=20-03-2016#1436918 << now i'll bite, ~where~ uncontroversial ? at mircea_popescu's house ?
Mon Mar 21 01:43:51 UTC 2016 <assbot> Logged on 20-03-2016 23:50:19; mircea_popescu: looky, that nonsense isn't going to snivel into factuality just because butthurt. chinese miner conspiracy is a fact, undisputed and accepted as such.
Sun Mar 20 23:58:16 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> i am saying that whatever you're talking to her about, stick to it an' let me be.
Sun Mar 20 23:55:34 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> looky : part of your trying to cope with hanbot's deriding your peculiar notion of responsibility was to come hide under my skirts. i said plox don't come hide under my skirts. that's all.
Sun Mar 20 23:52:59 UTC 2016 <mircea_popescu> that has exactly nothing to do with the discussion, so let's let it be.